Often we have the task of comparing two seqno known to be on the same
context, so provide a common __dma_fence_is_later().

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.sem...@linaro.org>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanp...@chromium.org>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gust...@padovan.org>
---
 include/linux/dma-fence.h | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
index a5195a7d6f77..ac5987989e9a 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
@@ -336,6 +336,19 @@ dma_fence_is_signaled(struct dma_fence *fence)
 }
 
 /**
+ * __dma_fence_is_later - return if f1 is chronologically later than f2
+ * @f1:        [in]    the first fence's seqno
+ * @f2:        [in]    the second fence's seqno from the same context
+ *
+ * Returns true if f1 is chronologically later than f2. Both fences must be
+ * from the same context, since a seqno is not common across contexts.
+ */
+static inline bool __dma_fence_is_later(u32 f1, u32 f2)
+{
+       return (int)(f1 - f2) > 0;
+}
+
+/**
  * dma_fence_is_later - return if f1 is chronologically later than f2
  * @f1:        [in]    the first fence from the same context
  * @f2:        [in]    the second fence from the same context
@@ -349,7 +362,7 @@ static inline bool dma_fence_is_later(struct dma_fence *f1,
        if (WARN_ON(f1->context != f2->context))
                return false;
 
-       return (int)(f1->seqno - f2->seqno) > 0;
+       return __dma_fence_is_later(f1->seqno, f2->seqno);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.13.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to