On 5 July 2017 at 10:14, Archit Taneja <arch...@codeaurora.org> wrote: > > > On 07/05/2017 02:35 PM, Inki Dae wrote: >> >> >> >> 2017년 07월 05일 18:00에 Archit Taneja 이(가) 쓴 글: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 07/03/2017 02:12 PM, Inki Dae wrote: >>>> >>>> This patch removes unnecessary checking of return value. >>>> >>>> Ps. this patch depends on below one, >>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg145687.html >>> >>> >>> Will this one^ go via the exynos pull req or drm-misc? If there won't >>> be any conflicts, we could get both the patches through drm-misc to >>> keep things simple. >> >> >> exynos pull it would be better. I will pick this up. :) > > > If patch # 1/14 goes through drm-misc, and the exynos patch goes through > exynos pull, the drm-misc branch would break. That's the reason I > preferred the exynos patches to go via misc. > As mentioned in 1/14:
If 1/14 is applied before the rest of the series all the drivers (addressed with 2-14) will fail to build. I think... -Emil _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
