Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> writes: > I was mostly thinking of the 'seq = query(); wait(seq + n);' pattern > where we can avoid doing the full update more than once if we enable > the interrupt already during the query.
Don't we still wait 5 seconds before disabling vblank? In that case, the chances of hitting an idle vblank are pretty slim if the application is actually busy. -- -keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
