On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:03:18PM +0530, Shashank Sharma wrote:
> To support ycbcr output, we need a pipe CSC block to do
> RGB->YCBCR conversion.
> 
> Current Intel platforms have only one pipe CSC unit, so
> we can either do color correction using it, or we can perform
> RGB->YCBCR conversion.
> 
> This function adds a csc handler, which uses recommended bspec
> values to perform RGB->YCBCR conversion (target color space BT709)
> 
> V2: Rebase
> V3: Rebase
> V4: Rebase
> V5: Addressed review comments from Ander
>     - Remove extra line added in the patch
>     - Add the spec details in the commit message
>     - Combine two if(cond) while calling intel_crtc_compute_config
> V6: Handle YCBCR420 outputs only (Ville)
> V7: Addressed review comments from Ville:
>     - Add description about target colorspace
>     - Remove the comments from CSC function
>     - DRM_DEBUG->DEBUG_KMS for atomic failure due to CSC unit busy
>     - Remove unnecessary debug message about YCBCR420 possibe
> 
> Cc: Ville Syrjala <[email protected]>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <[email protected]>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c   | 46 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 15 ++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
> index f85d575..8698691 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,22 @@
>  
>  #define LEGACY_LUT_LENGTH            (sizeof(struct drm_color_lut) * 256)
>  
> +/* Post offset values for RGB->YCBCR conversion */
> +#define POSTOFF_RGB_TO_YUV_HI 0x800
> +#define POSTOFF_RGB_TO_YUV_ME 0x100
> +#define POSTOFF_RGB_TO_YUV_LO 0x800
> +
> +/*
> + * These values are direct register values specified in the Bspec,
> + * for RGB->YUV conversion matrix (colorspace BT709)
> + */
> +#define CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_RU_GU 0x2ba809d8
> +#define CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_BU 0x37e80000
> +#define CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_RY_GY 0x1e089cc0
> +#define CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_BY 0xb5280000
> +#define CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_RV_GV 0xbce89ad8
> +#define CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_BV 0x1e080000
> +
>  /*
>   * Extract the CSC coefficient from a CTM coefficient (in U32.32 fixed point
>   * format). This macro takes the coefficient we want transformed and the
> @@ -91,6 +107,31 @@ static void ctm_mult_by_limited(uint64_t *result, int64_t 
> *input)
>       }
>  }
>  
> +void i9xx_load_ycbcr_conversion_matrix(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc)
> +{
> +     int pipe = intel_crtc->pipe;
> +     struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_crtc->base.dev);
> +
> +
> +     I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_PREOFF_HI(pipe), 0);
> +     I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_PREOFF_ME(pipe), 0);
> +     I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_PREOFF_LO(pipe), 0);
> +
> +     I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_COEFF_RU_GU(pipe), CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_RU_GU);
> +     I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_COEFF_BU(pipe), CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_BU);
> +
> +     I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_COEFF_RY_GY(pipe), CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_RY_GY);
> +     I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_COEFF_BY(pipe), CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_BY);
> +
> +     I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_COEFF_RV_GV(pipe), CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_RV_GV);
> +     I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_COEFF_BV(pipe), CSC_RGB_TO_YUV_BV);
> +
> +     I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_POSTOFF_HI(pipe), POSTOFF_RGB_TO_YUV_HI);
> +     I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_POSTOFF_ME(pipe), POSTOFF_RGB_TO_YUV_ME);
> +     I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_POSTOFF_LO(pipe), POSTOFF_RGB_TO_YUV_LO);
> +     I915_WRITE(PIPE_CSC_MODE(pipe), 0);
> +}
> +
>  /* Set up the pipe CSC unit. */
>  static void i9xx_load_csc_matrix(struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  {
> @@ -101,7 +142,10 @@ static void i9xx_load_csc_matrix(struct drm_crtc_state 
> *crtc_state)
>       uint16_t coeffs[9] = { 0, };
>       struct intel_crtc_state *intel_crtc_state = 
> to_intel_crtc_state(crtc_state);
>  
> -     if (crtc_state->ctm) {
> +     if (intel_crtc_state->ycbcr420) {
> +             i9xx_load_ycbcr_conversion_matrix(intel_crtc);
> +             return;
> +     } else if (crtc_state->ctm) {
>               struct drm_color_ctm *ctm =
>                       (struct drm_color_ctm *)crtc_state->ctm->data;
>               uint64_t input[9] = { 0, };
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 1a23ec0..9c6a1ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -6283,6 +6283,21 @@ static int intel_crtc_compute_config(struct intel_crtc 
> *crtc,
>               return -EINVAL;
>       }
>  
> +     /* YCBCR420 feasibility check */

Not a useful comment.

> +     if (pipe_config->ycbcr420) {
> +             struct drm_crtc_state *drm_state = &pipe_config->base;

Having aliasing pointer for the same thing is just annoying.
We do have quite a lot of that going around, but IMO we need
to clean that all up at some point.

So pls just do this instead:

if (pipe_config->ycbcr420 && pipe_config->base.ctm) {
        ...
}

> +
> +             /*
> +              * There is only one pipe CSC unit per pipe, and we need that
> +              * for output conversion from RGB->YCBCR. So if CTM is already
> +              * applied we can't support YCBCR420 output.
> +              */
> +             if (drm_state->ctm) {
> +                     DRM_DEBUG_KMS("YCBCR420 and CTM is not possible\n");
> +                     return -EINVAL;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
>       /*
>        * Pipe horizontal size must be even in:
>        * - DVO ganged mode
> -- 
> 2.7.4

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to