On 06/08/17 12:42 PM, Keith Packard wrote: > Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> writes: > >> [...] >> >>> +#define DRM_CRTC_SEQUENCE_NEXT_ON_MISS 0x00000002 /* Use >>> next sequence if we've missed */ >> >> Do you have userspace making use of DRM_CRTC_SEQUENCE_NEXT_ON_MISS? If >> not, drop it. > > I added this so that the new ioctl would be compatible with the old > ioctl; do you think that's unnecessary?
I do. I don't know if there's ever been any real-world usage of DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS. Let's not repeat my mistake in the new interface. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel