Hi,
On 11/17/2017 04:29 AM, John Stultz wrote:
From: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
An otherwise correct cleanup patch from Dan Carpenter turned a broken
failure handling from a feature patch by Hans Verkuil into a kernel
Oops, so bisection points to commit 7af35b0addbc ("drm/kirin: Checking
for IS_ERR() instead of NULL") rather than 3b1b975003e4 ("drm:
adv7511/33: add HDMI CEC support").
I've managed to piece together several partial problems, though
I'm still struggling with the bigger picture:
adv7511_probe() registers a drm_bridge structure that was allocated
with devm_kzalloc(). It calls adv7511_cec_init(), which fails for an
unknown reason, which in turn triggers the registered structure to be
removed.
Elsewhere, kirin_drm_platform_probe() gets called, which calls
of_graph_get_remote_node(), and that returns NULL. Before Dan's
patch we would go on with a NULL pointer here and register that,
now kirin_drm_platform_probe() fails with -ENODEV.
In a third driver, dsi_parse_dt() calls drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(),
which after not finding a panel goes on to call of_drm_find_bridge(),
and that crashes due to the earlier list corruption.
This addresses the first issue by making sure that adv7511_probe()
does not completely fail when the adv7511_cec_init() function fails,
and instead we just disable the CEC feature. This avoids having the
driver entirely fail to load if just the CEC initialization fails.
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamb...@linaro.org>
Cc: Xinliang Liu <xinliang....@linaro.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanp...@chromium.org>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com>
Cc: Archit Taneja <arch...@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3345
Link: https://lkft.validation.linaro.org/scheduler/job/48017#L3551
Fixes: 7af35b0addbc ("drm/kirin: Checking for IS_ERR() instead of NULL")
Fixes: 3b1b975003e4 ("drm: adv7511/33: add HDMI CEC support")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
[jstultz: Reworked so when adv7511_cec_init() fails, we disable the feature
instead
of disabling the entire driver, which causes graphics to not funciton]
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org>
---
Just wanted to send out my rework of Arnd's patch here.
Feedback would be welcome.
thanks
-john
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
index 0e14f15..939c3b9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c
@@ -1203,12 +1203,12 @@ static int adv7511_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c, const
struct i2c_device_id *id)
#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I2C_ADV7511_CEC
ret = adv7511_cec_init(dev, adv7511, offset);
- if (ret)
- goto err_unregister_cec;
#else
- regmap_write(adv7511->regmap, ADV7511_REG_CEC_CTRL + offset,
- ADV7511_CEC_CTRL_POWER_DOWN);
+ ret = 1;
#endif
+ if (ret)
+ regmap_write(adv7511->regmap, ADV7511_REG_CEC_CTRL + offset,
+ ADV7511_CEC_CTRL_POWER_DOWN);
This would force CEC to be powered off even if adv7511_cec_init() returned 0,
right?
We wouldn't want that if we want to use CEC on a platform that supports it.
Do we know why the call to adv7511_cec_init() is failing on the Hikey board? If
it's
because there isn't a "cec" clock specified in DT, it's not really a fatal
error, it
just means that the platform hasn't been set up to support CEC. In that case, we
should just power down the CEC block. So, if adv7511_cec_init() would return a
-ENOENT, which we could use as a hint to power down CEC. So, maybe something
like this?:
#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I2C_ADV7511_CEC
ret = adv7511_cec_init(dev, adv7511, offset);
if (ret && ret != -ENOENT)
goto err_unregister_cec;
#endif
if (ret)
regmap_write(adv7511->regmap, ADV7511_REG_CEC_CTRL + offset,
ADV7511_CEC_CTRL_POWER_DOWN);
Apart from this, we should also move adv7511_cec_init() up in the probe so that
it's called before the drm_bridge is registered.
Thanks,
Archit
return 0;
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
