Hi, > Actually, I don't want that :) > > This was a design decision that I've made to keep the code small and simple > to audit. > As it is, the simple bootsplash code will make 99% of people happy. You think only 1% of linux users have more than one monitor or a 4k screen?
> I've made this decision from the point of view of someone who wants to ship a > general > purpose distribution. If you have a look around and compare this to e.g. the > Windows or > Mac OS X bootsplashes, the possibilities that my kernel code provides already > surpasses them. I haven't looked specifically, but I don't believe you :-) You're telling me the apple boot splash isn't scaled up on machines with retina displays? I don't use OSX (or windows), so I don't know, but I'd be really surprised. > If you really want such sophisticated features, supplanting the initial > bootsplash with > Plymouth (or not using it at all) is a better solution. In my opinion, it is > overengineering, > at least for kernel code. disagree..it's support for basic, commodity hardware these days. > As for HiDPI, if you're working on an embedded device with a fixed screen > size - > say a phone - you can easily include a huge picture the size of the screen in > the > bootsplash. I'm talking about a situation where you have a dell xps or whatever with an external monitor attached. Each monitor should be able to show the splash without deforming it, and without making it huge or microscopic. pretty basic stuff... --Ray _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
