On 2018-01-26 01:29 PM, Tom St Denis wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Tom St Denis <tom.stde...@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
> index 07b22f04b969..6311f8a481ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
> @@ -345,6 +345,7 @@ static int ttm_bo_vm_access_kmap(struct ttm_buffer_object 
> *bo,
>               page++;
>               bytes_left -= bytes;
>               offset = 0;
> +             buf += bytes;

I'd put this right before the bytes_left -= bytes.

Also, buf is a void *. That makes pointer arithmetic on it somewhat
undefined. From what I can find, GCC supports it as an extension. See
also
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3523145/pointer-arithmetic-for-void-pointer-in-c.

If it compiles without a warning, I guess it's OK as is.

Regards,
  Felix

>       } while (bytes_left);
>  
>       return len;

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to