On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 08:37:13PM +0000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On 6 February 2018 at 06:32, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 08:14:48AM +0000, Keith Packard wrote: > >> Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com> writes: > >> > >> > From: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com> > >> > > >> > drm_vblank_count() has an u32 type returning what is a 64-bit vblank > >> > count. > >> > The effect of this is when drm_wait_vblank_ioctl() tries to widen the > >> > user > >> > space requested vblank sequence using this clipped 32-bit count(when the > >> > value is >= 2^32) as reference, the requested sequence remains a 32-bit > >> > value and gets queued like that. However, the code that checks if the > >> > requested sequence has passed compares this against the 64-bit vblank > >> > count. > >> > >> For patches 1-7: > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> > > > > Dave, ack to merge them through drm-intel-next-queued ? > > Ack. do we know if any of those need to be in -fixes? > > or too early to tell?
I didn't checked the drm one close enough yet to decide for that. DK or Keith? do you guys see anyone suitable for fixes? For the other work on top I believe we don't need to move to fixes since psr is still disabled. > > Dave. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
