On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 01:57:26PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 11:41:02PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > To make life easier for drivers, let's have the core check that the
> > requested pixel format is supported by at least one plane when creating
> > a new framebuffer.
> > 
> > v2: Accept anyformat if the driver doesn't do planes (Eric)
> >     s/planes_have_format/any_plane_has_format/ (Eric)
> >     Check the modifier as well since we already have a function
> >     that does both
> > 
> > Cc: Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c | 43 
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
> > index c0530a1af5e3..b9a33e3f13e9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
> > @@ -152,12 +152,37 @@ static int fb_plane_height(int height,
> >     return DIV_ROUND_UP(height, format->vsub);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static bool any_plane_has_format(struct drm_device *dev,
> > +                            u32 format, u64 modifier)
> > +{
> > +   struct drm_plane *plane;
> > +
> > +   /* TODO: maybe maintain a device level format list? */
> > +   drm_for_each_plane(plane, dev) {
> > +           /*
> > +            * In case the driver doesn't really do
> > +            * planes we have to accept any format here.
> > +            */
> > +           if (plane->format_default)
> > +                   return true;
> > +
> > +           if (drm_plane_check_pixel_format(plane, format, modifier) == 0)
> > +                   return true;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return false;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int framebuffer_check(struct drm_device *dev,
> >                          const struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 *r)
> >  {
> >     const struct drm_format_info *info;
> > +   u64 modifier = 0;
> >     int i;
> >  
> > +   if (r->flags & DRM_MODE_FB_MODIFIERS)
> > +           modifier = r->modifier[0];
> 
> And of course this isn't quite correct. For the !modifiers case we're
> now checking if any plane supports the format with the linear modifier,
> but the actual modifier will only be picked by the driver later.
> 
> Not quite sure how I would write this in a way that really makes
> sense. Might have to make it the driver's responsibility to call
> any_plane_has_format() instead...

Hmm. One idea would be to stick the check into drm_framebuffer_init(),
but I'm not comfortable with that since the driver may well be doing
things in its .fb_create() hook that expects the format+modifier to
have been validated already, and drm_framebuffer_init() should only be
called once everything is ready.

I guess I'll just export drm_any_plane_has_format() and add some
kerneldoc for .fb_create() to let people know about it. Better ideas
are welcome of course.

> 
> > +
> >     /* check if the format is supported at all */
> >     info = __drm_format_info(r->pixel_format & ~DRM_FORMAT_BIG_ENDIAN);
> >     if (!info) {
> > @@ -168,6 +193,15 @@ static int framebuffer_check(struct drm_device *dev,
> >             return -EINVAL;
> >     }
> >  
> > +   if (!any_plane_has_format(dev, r->pixel_format, modifier)) {
> > +           struct drm_format_name_buf format_name;
> > +
> > +           DRM_DEBUG_KMS("unsupported pixel format %s, modifier 0x%llx\n",
> > +                         drm_get_format_name(r->pixel_format, 
> > &format_name),
> > +                         modifier);
> > +           return -EINVAL;
> > +   }
> > +
> >     /* now let the driver pick its own format info */
> >     info = drm_get_format_info(dev, r);
> >  
> > @@ -202,14 +236,7 @@ static int framebuffer_check(struct drm_device *dev,
> >                     return -EINVAL;
> >             }
> >  
> > -           if (r->modifier[i] && !(r->flags & DRM_MODE_FB_MODIFIERS)) {
> > -                   DRM_DEBUG_KMS("bad fb modifier %llu for plane %d\n",
> > -                                 r->modifier[i], i);
> > -                   return -EINVAL;
> > -           }
> > -
> > -           if (r->flags & DRM_MODE_FB_MODIFIERS &&
> > -               r->modifier[i] != r->modifier[0]) {
> > +           if (r->modifier[i] != modifier) {
> >                     DRM_DEBUG_KMS("bad fb modifier %llu for plane %d\n",
> >                                   r->modifier[i], i);
> >                     return -EINVAL;
> > -- 
> > 2.16.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to