Hi Chanwoo, Archit,

On 07.03.2018 05:48, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 2018년 03월 07일 11:12, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi Rob and Andrzej,
>> On 2018년 03월 06일 21:53, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>> Hi Rob, Chanwoo, Krzysztof,
>>> On 27.02.2018 08:11, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> Thanks for reviews of previous iterations.
>>>> This patchset introduces USB physical connector bindings, together with
>>>> working example.
>>>> I have removed RFC prefix - the patchset seems to be heading
>>>> to a happy end :)
>>>> v5: fixed extra parenthesis in dts, renamed extcon function.
>>>> v4: improved binding descriptions, added missing reg in dts.
>>>> v3: Separate binding for Samsung 11-pin connector, added full-blown USB-C
>>>>     example.
>>>> v2: I have addressed comments by Rob and Laurent, thanks 
>>>> Changes in datail are described in the patches.
>>>> Regards
>>>> Andrzej
>>>> Andrzej Hajda (5):
>>>>   dt-bindings: add bindings for USB physical connector
>>>>   dt-bindings: add bindings for Samsung micro-USB 11-pin connector
>>>>   arm64: dts: exynos: add micro-USB connector node to TM2 platforms
>>>>   arm64: dts: exynos: add OF graph between MHL and USB connector
>>>>   extcon: add possibility to get extcon device by OF node
>>>> Maciej Purski (1):
>>>>   drm/bridge/sii8620: use micro-USB cable detection logic to detect MHL
>>> It looks like all patches received R-B or acks (I forgot add Krzysztof's
>>> acks for dts part).
>>> Now I have a question how to merge them.
>>> The only functional dependency is between bridge and extcon, and from
>>> the formal PoV bindings should be merged 1st.
>>> I can merge it:
>>> 1. All patches via drm-misc tree.
>>> 2. All patches except dts via drm-misc, and Krzysztof will merge dts via
>>> samsung-soc tree.
>>> Is it OK, for all? Better ideas?
>> Krzysztof picked the dts patches. I'll make the immutable branch based on 
>> v4.16-rc1
>> and apply them except for dts patchs. And I'll send the immutable branch to 
>> Rob and Andrzej.
> I made the immutable branch[1] as following: If you agree, I'll send pull 
> request.
> [1] 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/extcon.git/log/?h=ib-extcon-drm-dt-v4.17
> Or you can make the immutable branch and send pull request to Rob and me.

It seems you took v5 instead of v6 version of extcon patch.

Beside it I am OK with your immutable branch, Archit is it OK to do it
this way in drm-misc?



dri-devel mailing list

Reply via email to