Hi, Beside the discussion with Chen-Yu,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 04:28:57PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote: > It turns out that the frontend is not capable of preserving the alpha > component (that is always set to 0xff), so only support XRGB8888 > instead. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkow...@bootlin.com> > --- [...] > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_layer.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_layer.c > index eb93df445a10..15238211a61a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_layer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_layer.c > @@ -100,9 +100,9 @@ static void sun4i_backend_layer_atomic_update(struct > drm_plane *plane, > sun4i_frontend_update_coord(frontend, plane); > sun4i_frontend_update_buffer(frontend, plane); > sun4i_frontend_update_formats(frontend, plane, > - DRM_FORMAT_ARGB8888); > + DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888); > sun4i_backend_update_layer_frontend(backend, layer->id, plane, > - DRM_FORMAT_ARGB8888); > + DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888); Even though it's slightly related, these changes should be justified in the commit log. From what you currently explain, this makes 0 difference, since XRGB and ARGB with an alpha component to 0xff is exactly the same thing. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
