On 26 March 2018 at 11:26, Eric Engestrom <eric.engest...@imgtec.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engest...@imgtec.com>
> ---
> xf86drm.c | 6 +++---
> xf86drmMode.c | 6 ++++--
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xf86drm.c b/xf86drm.c
> index b6e5d8cc1bb50ffe75a2..5701952ae83634b47628 100644
> --- a/xf86drm.c
> +++ b/xf86drm.c
> @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static int drmOpenDevice(dev_t dev, int minor, int type)
> return -EINVAL;
> };
>
> - sprintf(buf, dev_name, DRM_DIR_NAME, minor);
> + snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), dev_name, DRM_DIR_NAME, minor);
The patch feels a big meh, for two reasons:
- buffer contents are controlled and will never overflow
- s{n,}printf return value is not checked
If there's a particular tool that should be silenced up sure, let's
land it. Otherwise I might as well list my 'grand master plan', we can
start deleting all this code ;-)
What do you think?
Emil
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
