On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 4/16/12 10:40 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: >> >> Requiring the first byte of the EDID base block header to be 0 means we >> don't fix up as many transfer errors as we could. Instead have the >> callers specify whether it's meant to be block 0 or not, and >> conditionally run header fixup based on that. > > > Anybody? This appears to be a pretty common form of EDID corruption.
Seems reasonable to me. Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeuc...@gmail.com> > > - ajax > > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
