On 2018-04-13 19:46, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 12:59:15PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Useful for beating cases where an output mode selection heuristic >> fails. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <p...@axentia.se> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt >> index 82f2acb3d374..dc478455b883 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/atmel/hlcdc-dc.txt >> @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ Required properties: >> - #address-cells: should be set to 1. >> - #size-cells: should be set to 0. >> >> +Optional properties: >> + - output-mode: override any output mode selection hueristic and force a >> + particular output mode. One of "rgb444", "rgb565", "rgb666" and "rgb888". >> + > > This needs to be generic, not just added to some random display > controller binding. > > It also belongs in the port or endpoint node as is done for camera > interfaces.
Hmm, should I extend media/video-interfaces.txt with more bus types (or since I'm targeting parallel interfaces, perhaps the new bus types should be autodetected from other props?) or should a write a new binding similar to it? One question regarding bus-width, should it include hsync/vsync/de/clk? If yes, how to distinguish rgb565 with all those four from rgb666 with only de/clk (some panels do not need hsync/vsync)? 20 lines in both cases... Or are rgb444/rgb565/rgb666/rgb888 already supported by the media video interface binding? That's not at all obvious to me. Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list email@example.com https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel