On 17 May 2018 at 16:26, Russell King - ARM Linux <li...@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 02:15:40PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On 30 March 2018 at 15:11, Daniel Stone <dani...@collabora.com> wrote:
>> > Since drm_framebuffer can now store GEM objects directly, place them
>> > there rather than in our own subclass. As this makes the framebuffer
>> > create_handle and destroy functions the same as the GEM framebuffer
>> > helper, we can reuse those.
>> Ping - have you had a chance to look at this?
> I haven't, I've not moved any of my trees off 4.16 yet as I've been
> away on vacation, and also busy dealing with Spectre for 32-bit ARM.
> From a quick look, it seems fine, and as I guess the autobuilders
> haven't complained, it probably builds okay. So it can probably
> be merged without much risk - if there are any problems I'll sort it
> out later.
Thanks Russell. I did do a build test locally as well which had no
complaints. I'll merge this through drm-misc.
dri-devel mailing list