On 2018-06-17 04:52 AM, Stefan Agner wrote:
Explicitly use the first uvd instance to avoid a build error when
using clang 6:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c:1148:52: error: expected ')'
                 container_of(work, struct amdgpu_device, 
uvd.inst->idle_work.work);
                                                                  ^
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c:1148:3: note: to match this '('
                 container_of(work, struct amdgpu_device, 
uvd.inst->idle_work.work);
                 ^
./include/linux/kernel.h:967:21: note: expanded from macro 'container_of'
         ((type *)(__mptr - offsetof(type, member))); })
                            ^
./include/linux/stddef.h:17:32: note: expanded from macro 'offsetof'
                                 ^
./include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:170:20: note: expanded from macro
       '__compiler_offsetof'
         __builtin_offsetof(a, b)
                           ^
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c:1147:24: error: initializing
       'struct amdgpu_device *' with an expression of incompatible type 'void'
         struct amdgpu_device *adev =
                               ^
2 errors generated.

Fixes: 10dd74eac4db ("drm/amdgpu/vg20:Restruct uvd.inst to support multiple 
instances")
Cc: James Zhu <james....@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <ste...@agner.ch>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
index bcf68f80bbf0..6666a5888c44 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_uvd.c
@@ -1145,7 +1145,7 @@ int amdgpu_uvd_get_destroy_msg(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, 
uint32_t handle,
  static void amdgpu_uvd_idle_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
  {
        struct amdgpu_device *adev =
-               container_of(work, struct amdgpu_device, 
uvd.inst->idle_work.work);
+               container_of(work, struct amdgpu_device, 
uvd.inst[0].idle_work.work);
Hi Alex,
If all instances share one idle work from hardware view currently and in the future , should we move struct delayed_work idle_work from struct amdgpu_uvd_inst to struct amdgpu_uvd?
James
        unsigned fences = 0, i, j;
for (i = 0; i < adev->uvd.num_uvd_inst; ++i) {

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to