Hi Jordan,
I might be a bit late for the party, so consider the following jfyi.
On 24 July 2018 at 17:33, Jordan Crouse <jcro...@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> +void drm_puts(struct drm_printer *p, const char *str)
One could easily use the compiler to detect if drm_printf or drm_puts
should be used. See the trace_printk define in include/linux/kernel.h.
> +{
> + if (p->puts)
> + p->puts(p, str);
> + else
> + drm_printf(p, "%s", str);
From a quick look from the existing three printers (seq_file, info and
debug) only the first one is updated with this series.
I would imagine that updating the other two and dropping the
drm_printf() fallback is a good move.
Otherwise one could easily assume that they have a fast path when they do not.
HTH
Emil
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
