From the review for the DT bindings for the GPU/GMU it
was suggested that the phandle for the GMU be
'qcom,gmu' instead of just 'gmu'.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcro...@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
index c629f742a1d1..9a14cb3d5027 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
@@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ struct msm_gpu *a6xx_gpu_init(struct drm_device *dev)
        }
 
        /* Check if there is a GMU phandle and set it up */
-       node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "gmu", 0);
+       node = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "qcom,gmu", 0);
 
        /* FIXME: How do we gracefully handle this? */
        BUG_ON(!node);
-- 
2.18.0

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to