On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 03:19:37PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> On Sun Ultra 5, it happens that the dot clock is not set up properly for
> some videomodes. For example, if we set the videomode "r1024x768x60" in
> the firmware, Linux would incorrectly set a videomode with refresh rate
> 180Hz when booting (suprisingly, my LCD monitor can display it, although
> display quality is very low).
>
> The reason is this: Older mach64 cards set the divider in the register
> VCLK_POST_DIV. The register has four 2-bit fields (the field that is
> actually used is specified in the lowest two bits of the register
> CLOCK_CNTL). The 2 bits select divider "1, 2, 4, 8". On newer mach64 cards,
> there's another bit added - the top four bits of PLL_EXT_CNTL extend the
> divider selection, so we have possible dividers "1, 2, 4, 8, 3, 5, 6, 12".
> The Linux driver clears the top four bits of PLL_EXT_CNTL and never sets
> them, so it can work regardless if the card supports them. However, the
> sparc64 firmware may set these extended dividers during boot - and the
> mach64 driver detects incorrect dot clock in this case.
>
> This patch makes the driver read the additional divider bit from
> PLL_EXT_CNTL and calculate the initial refresh rate properly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpato...@redhat.com>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
>
> ---
> drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb.h | 3 ++-
> drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb_base.c | 7 ++++---
> drivers/video/fbdev/aty/mach64_ct.c | 10 +++++-----
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-stable/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-stable.orig/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb.h 2018-08-13
> 21:12:11.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-stable/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb.h 2018-08-13
> 21:17:14.000000000 +0200
> @@ -333,6 +333,8 @@ extern const struct aty_pll_ops aty_pll_
> extern void aty_set_pll_ct(const struct fb_info *info, const union aty_pll
> *pll);
> extern u8 aty_ld_pll_ct(int offset, const struct atyfb_par *par);
>
> +extern const u8 aty_postdividers[8];
> +
>
> /*
> * Hardware cursor support
> @@ -359,7 +361,6 @@ static inline void wait_for_idle(struct
>
> extern void aty_reset_engine(const struct atyfb_par *par);
> extern void aty_init_engine(struct atyfb_par *par, struct fb_info *info);
> -extern u8 aty_ld_pll_ct(int offset, const struct atyfb_par *par);
>
> void atyfb_copyarea(struct fb_info *info, const struct fb_copyarea *area);
> void atyfb_fillrect(struct fb_info *info, const struct fb_fillrect *rect);
> Index: linux-stable/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb_base.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-stable.orig/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb_base.c 2018-08-13
> 21:12:11.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-stable/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/atyfb_base.c 2018-08-13
> 21:22:23.000000000 +0200
> @@ -3087,17 +3087,18 @@ static int atyfb_setup_sparc(struct pci_
> /*
> * PLL Reference Divider M:
> */
> - M = pll_regs[2];
> + M = pll_regs[PLL_REF_DIV];
>
> /*
> * PLL Feedback Divider N (Dependent on CLOCK_CNTL):
> */
> - N = pll_regs[7 + (clock_cntl & 3)];
> + N = pll_regs[VCLK0_FB_DIV + (clock_cntl & 3)];
>
> /*
> * PLL Post Divider P (Dependent on CLOCK_CNTL):
> */
> - P = 1 << (pll_regs[6] >> ((clock_cntl & 3) << 1));
> + P = aty_postdividers[((pll_regs[VCLK_POST_DIV] >> ((clock_cntl
> & 3) << 1)) & 3) |
> + ((pll_regs[PLL_EXT_CNTL] >> (2 +
> (clock_cntl & 3))) & 4)];
>
> /*
> * PLL Divider Q:
> Index: linux-stable/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/mach64_ct.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-stable.orig/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/mach64_ct.c 2018-08-13
> 21:12:11.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-stable/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/mach64_ct.c 2018-08-13
> 21:35:32.000000000 +0200
> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static void aty_st_pll_ct(int offset, u8
> */
>
> #define Maximum_DSP_PRECISION 7
> -static u8 postdividers[] = {1,2,4,8,3};
> +const u8 aty_postdividers[8] = {1,2,4,8,3,5,6,12};
Not sure about the '5'. That setting is marked as reserved in my docs.
So I guess it doesn't really matter what number we put there.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <syrj...@sci.fi>
>
> static int aty_dsp_gt(const struct fb_info *info, u32 bpp, struct pll_ct
> *pll)
> {
> @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static int aty_valid_pll_ct(const struct
> pll->vclk_post_div += (q < 64*8);
> pll->vclk_post_div += (q < 32*8);
> }
> - pll->vclk_post_div_real = postdividers[pll->vclk_post_div];
> + pll->vclk_post_div_real = aty_postdividers[pll->vclk_post_div];
> // pll->vclk_post_div <<= 6;
> pll->vclk_fb_div = q * pll->vclk_post_div_real / 8;
> pllvclk = (1000000 * 2 * pll->vclk_fb_div) /
> @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ static int aty_init_pll_ct(const struct
> u8 mclk_fb_div, pll_ext_cntl;
> pll->ct.pll_ref_div = aty_ld_pll_ct(PLL_REF_DIV, par);
> pll_ext_cntl = aty_ld_pll_ct(PLL_EXT_CNTL, par);
> - pll->ct.xclk_post_div_real = postdividers[pll_ext_cntl & 0x07];
> + pll->ct.xclk_post_div_real = aty_postdividers[pll_ext_cntl &
> 0x07];
> mclk_fb_div = aty_ld_pll_ct(MCLK_FB_DIV, par);
> if (pll_ext_cntl & PLL_MFB_TIMES_4_2B)
> mclk_fb_div <<= 1;
> @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ static int aty_init_pll_ct(const struct
> xpost_div += (q < 64*8);
> xpost_div += (q < 32*8);
> }
> - pll->ct.xclk_post_div_real = postdividers[xpost_div];
> + pll->ct.xclk_post_div_real = aty_postdividers[xpost_div];
> pll->ct.mclk_fb_div = q * pll->ct.xclk_post_div_real / 8;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC
> @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ static int aty_init_pll_ct(const struct
> mpost_div += (q < 64*8);
> mpost_div += (q < 32*8);
> }
> - sclk_post_div_real = postdividers[mpost_div];
> + sclk_post_div_real = aty_postdividers[mpost_div];
> pll->ct.sclk_fb_div = q * sclk_post_div_real / 8;
> pll->ct.spll_cntl2 = mpost_div << 4;
> #ifdef DEBUG
--
Ville Syrjälä
syrj...@sci.fi
http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
