Hi Jacopo,

Thank you for the patch.

On Wednesday, 22 August 2018 10:21:47 EEST Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> Document and re-name the 'dpll_ch' field to a more precise 'dpll_mask' for
> consistency with the 'channels_mask' field defined in 'struct
> rcar_du_device_info'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+rene...@jmondi.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c | 2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c  | 6 +++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.h  | 3 ++-
>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c index 2664336..5454884 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_crtc.c
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void rcar_du_crtc_set_display_timing(struct
> rcar_du_crtc *rcrtc) u32 dsmr;
>       u32 escr;
> 
> -     if (rcdu->info->dpll_ch & (1 << rcrtc->index)) {
> +     if (rcdu->info->dpll_mask & (1 << rcrtc->index)) {
>               unsigned long target = mode_clock;
>               struct dpll_info dpll = { 0 };
>               unsigned long extclk;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c index 02aee6c..b42145c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c
> @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static const struct rcar_du_device_info
> rcar_du_r8a7795_info = { },
>       },
>       .num_lvds = 1,
> -     .dpll_ch =  BIT(2) | BIT(1),
> +     .dpll_mask =  BIT(2) | BIT(1),
>  };
> 
>  static const struct rcar_du_device_info rcar_du_r8a7796_info = {
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static const struct rcar_du_device_info
> rcar_du_r8a7796_info = { },
>       },
>       .num_lvds = 1,
> -     .dpll_ch =  BIT(1),
> +     .dpll_mask =  BIT(1),
>  };
> 
>  static const struct rcar_du_device_info rcar_du_r8a77965_info = {
> @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static const struct rcar_du_device_info
> rcar_du_r8a77965_info = { },
>       },
>       .num_lvds = 1,
> -     .dpll_ch =  BIT(1),
> +     .dpll_mask =  BIT(1),
>  };
> 
>  static const struct rcar_du_device_info rcar_du_r8a77970_info = {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.h index b3a25e8..6453b33 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.h
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct rcar_du_output_routing {
>   * @channels_mask: bit mask of available DU channels
>   * @routes: array of CRTC to output routes, indexed by output
> (RCAR_DU_OUTPUT_*) * @num_lvds: number of internal LVDS encoders
> + * @dpll_mask: mask of DU channels equipped with a DPLL

I'd way "bit mask" instead of "mask" in the description. Apart from that,

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>

and taken in my tree.

>   */
>  struct rcar_du_device_info {
>       unsigned int gen;
> @@ -63,7 +64,7 @@ struct rcar_du_device_info {
>       unsigned int channels_mask;
>       struct rcar_du_output_routing routes[RCAR_DU_OUTPUT_MAX];
>       unsigned int num_lvds;
> -     unsigned int dpll_ch;
> +     unsigned int dpll_mask;
>  };
> 
>  #define RCAR_DU_MAX_CRTCS            4

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart



_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to