On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 03:52:51PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 04-09-18 om 15:50 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 02:47:51PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Op 30-08-18 om 16:24 schreef Stanislav Lisovskiy:
> >>> PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_AYUV is already supported, according to hardware
> >>> specification.
> >>>
> >>> v2: Edited commit message, removed redundant whitespaces.
> >>>
> >>> v3: Fixed fallthrough logic for the format switch cases.
> >>>
> >>> v4: Yet again fixed fallthrough logic, to reuse code from other case
> >>>     labels.
> >>>
> >>> v5: Started to use XYUV instead of AYUV, as we don't use alpha.
> >>>
> >>> v6: Removed unneeded initializer for new XYUV format.
> >>>
> >>> v7: Added scaling support for DRM_FORMAT_XYUV
> >>>
> >>> v8: Edited commit message to be more clear about skl+, renamed
> >>>     PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_AYUV to PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_XYUV as this format
> >>>     doesn't support per-pixel alpha. Fixed minor code issues.
> >>>
> >>> v9: Moved DRM format check to proper place in intel_framebuffer_init.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovs...@intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h      |  2 +-
> >>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c  |  1 +
> >>>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h 
> >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> >>> index 8534f88a60f6..e0c8480aaa02 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> >>> @@ -6499,7 +6499,7 @@ enum {
> >>>  #define   PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_XRGB_2101010          (2 << 24)
> >>>  #define   PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_XRGB_8888             (4 << 24)
> >>>  #define   PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_XRGB_16161616F        (6 << 24)
> >>> -#define   PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_AYUV                  (8 << 24)
> >>> +#define   PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_XYUV                  (8 << 24)
> >>>  #define   PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_INDEXED               (12 << 24)
> >>>  #define   PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_RGB_565               (14 << 24)
> >>>  #define   ICL_PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_MASK              (0x1f << 23)
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >>> index 30fdfd1a3037..9323708db71f 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> >>> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ static const uint32_t skl_primary_formats[] = {
> >>>   DRM_FORMAT_YVYU,
> >>>   DRM_FORMAT_UYVY,
> >>>   DRM_FORMAT_VYUY,
> >>> + DRM_FORMAT_XYUV,
> >>>  };
> >>>  
> >>>  static const uint32_t skl_pri_planar_formats[] = {
> >>> @@ -101,6 +102,7 @@ static const uint32_t skl_pri_planar_formats[] = {
> >>>   DRM_FORMAT_YVYU,
> >>>   DRM_FORMAT_UYVY,
> >>>   DRM_FORMAT_VYUY,
> >>> + DRM_FORMAT_XYUV,
> >>>   DRM_FORMAT_NV12,
> >>>  };
> >>>  
> >>> @@ -2672,6 +2674,8 @@ int skl_format_to_fourcc(int format, bool 
> >>> rgb_order, bool alpha)
> >>>           return DRM_FORMAT_RGB565;
> >>>   case PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_NV12:
> >>>           return DRM_FORMAT_NV12;
> >>> + case PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_XYUV:
> >>> +         return DRM_FORMAT_XYUV;
> >>>   default:
> >>>   case PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_XRGB_8888:
> >>>           if (rgb_order) {
> >>> @@ -3501,6 +3505,8 @@ static u32 skl_plane_ctl_format(uint32_t 
> >>> pixel_format)
> >>>           return PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_XRGB_2101010;
> >>>   case DRM_FORMAT_XBGR2101010:
> >>>           return PLANE_CTL_ORDER_RGBX | PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_XRGB_2101010;
> >>> + case DRM_FORMAT_XYUV:
> >>> +         return PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_XYUV;
> >>>   case DRM_FORMAT_YUYV:
> >>>           return PLANE_CTL_FORMAT_YUV422 | PLANE_CTL_YUV422_YUYV;
> >>>   case DRM_FORMAT_YVYU:
> >>> @@ -4959,6 +4965,7 @@ static int skl_update_scaler_plane(struct 
> >>> intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
> >>>   case DRM_FORMAT_UYVY:
> >>>   case DRM_FORMAT_VYUY:
> >>>   case DRM_FORMAT_NV12:
> >>> + case DRM_FORMAT_XYUV:
> >>>           break;
> >>>   default:
> >>>           DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[PLANE:%d:%s] FB:%d unsupported scaling format 
> >>> 0x%x\n",
> >>> @@ -13414,6 +13421,7 @@ static bool skl_plane_format_mod_supported(struct 
> >>> drm_plane *_plane,
> >>>   case DRM_FORMAT_UYVY:
> >>>   case DRM_FORMAT_VYUY:
> >>>   case DRM_FORMAT_NV12:
> >>> + case DRM_FORMAT_XYUV:
> >>>           if (modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED)
> >>>                   return true;
> >>>           /* fall through */
> >>> @@ -14540,6 +14548,13 @@ static int intel_framebuffer_init(struct 
> >>> intel_framebuffer *intel_fb,
> >>>                   goto err;
> >>>           }
> >>>           break;
> >>> + case DRM_FORMAT_XYUV:
> >>> +         if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 9) {
> >>> +                 DRM_DEBUG_KMS("unsupported pixel format: %s\n",
> >>> +                               
> >>> drm_get_format_name(mode_cmd->pixel_format, &format_name));
> >>> +                 goto err;
> >>> +         }
> >>> +         break;
> >> This hunk isn't needed. DRM core rejects any formats not in the format 
> >> arrays.
> > There is no formats array for addfb. My patches to elimintate this ugly
> > code by cross checking with every plane got stuck in limbo.
> >
> Link?

Two different sort of attempts:

Leave it up to each driver (Eric wasn't keen on taking this for vc4):
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/39701/

Make the core do it unconditionally (more convoluted due to the
legacy tiling->modifier handling):
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/39814/

So not really sure which way we should go. Or maybe there's a less
complex way to do this in the core?

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to