Split up the super large test cases of_unittest_find_node_by_name and
of_unittest_dynamic into properly sized and defined test cases.

Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhigg...@google.com>
---
 drivers/of/base-test.c | 315 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 260 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/base-test.c b/drivers/of/base-test.c
index 5731787a3fca8..46c3dd9ce6628 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base-test.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base-test.c
@@ -8,10 +8,10 @@
 
 #include "test-common.h"
 
-static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_basic(struct kunit *test)
 {
        struct device_node *np;
-       const char *options, *name;
+       const char *name;
 
        np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data");
        name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
@@ -20,11 +20,21 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit 
*test)
                               "find /testcase-data failed\n");
        of_node_put(np);
        kfree(name);
+}
 
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_trailing_slash(struct kunit *test)
+{
        /* Test if trailing '/' works */
        KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/"), NULL,
                            "trailing '/' on /testcase-data/ should fail\n");
 
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct device_node *np;
+       const char *name;
+
        np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
        KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
        name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%pOF", np);
@@ -33,6 +43,12 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit *test)
                               "find /testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a 
failed\n");
        of_node_put(np);
        kfree(name);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct device_node *np;
+       const char *name;
 
        np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias");
        KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
@@ -41,10 +57,23 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit 
*test)
                               "find testcase-alias failed\n");
        of_node_put(np);
        kfree(name);
+}
 
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias_and_slash(struct kunit *test)
+{
        /* Test if trailing '/' works on aliases */
        KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/"), NULL,
-                           "trailing '/' on testcase-alias/ should fail\n");
+                          "trailing '/' on testcase-alias/ should fail\n");
+}
+
+/*
+ * TODO(brendanhigg...@google.com): This looks like a duplicate of
+ * of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components
+ */
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components_2(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct device_node *np;
+       const char *name;
 
        np = of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a");
        KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
@@ -54,29 +83,60 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit 
*test)
                               "find testcase-alias/phandle-tests/consumer-a 
failed\n");
        of_node_put(np);
        kfree(name);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_path(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct device_node *np;
 
        KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
-                           of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data/missing-path"),
+                           np = of_find_node_by_path(
+                                           "/testcase-data/missing-path"),
                            NULL,
-                           "non-existent path returned node %pOF\n", np);
+                          "non-existent path returned node %pOF\n", np);
        of_node_put(np);
+}
 
-       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_find_node_by_path("missing-alias"), NULL,
-                           "non-existent alias returned node %pOF\n", np);
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct device_node *np;
+
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
+                           np = of_find_node_by_path("missing-alias"), NULL,
+                          "non-existent alias returned node %pOF\n", np);
        of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias_with_relative_path(
+               struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct device_node *np;
 
        KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
-                           of_find_node_by_path("testcase-alias/missing-path"),
+                           np = of_find_node_by_path(
+                                           "testcase-alias/missing-path"),
                            NULL,
-                           "non-existent alias with relative path returned 
node %pOF\n",
-                           np);
+                          "non-existent alias with relative path returned node 
%pOF\n",
+                          np);
        of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct device_node *np;
+       const char *options;
 
        np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", &options);
        KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
        KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testoption", options,
                               "option path test failed\n");
        of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_and_slash(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct device_node *np;
+       const char *options;
 
        np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:test/option", &options);
        KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
@@ -91,11 +151,22 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit 
*test)
        KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/option", options,
                               "option path test, subcase #2 failed\n");
        of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct device_node *np;
 
        np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/testcase-data:testoption", NULL);
        KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, np,
                                         "NULL option path test failed\n");
        of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct device_node *np;
+       const char *options;
 
        np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption",
                                       &options);
@@ -103,6 +174,13 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit 
*test)
        KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "testaliasoption", options,
                               "option alias path test failed\n");
        of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias_and_slash(
+               struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct device_node *np;
+       const char *options;
 
        np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:test/alias/option",
                                       &options);
@@ -110,11 +188,22 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit 
*test)
        KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ_MSG(test, "test/alias/option", options,
                               "option alias path test, subcase #1 failed\n");
        of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option_alias(struct kunit 
*test)
+{
+       struct device_node *np;
 
        np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias:testaliasoption", NULL);
-       KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(test, np,
-                                        "NULL option alias path test 
failed\n");
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG(
+                       test, np, "NULL option alias path test failed\n");
        of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct device_node *np;
+       const char *options;
 
        options = "testoption";
        np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("testcase-alias", &options);
@@ -122,6 +211,12 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit 
*test)
        KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, options, NULL,
                            "option clearing test failed\n");
        of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static void of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing_root(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct device_node *np;
+       const char *options;
 
        options = "testoption";
        np = of_find_node_opts_by_path("/", &options);
@@ -131,64 +226,147 @@ static void of_unittest_find_node_by_name(struct kunit 
*test)
        of_node_put(np);
 }
 
-static void of_unittest_dynamic(struct kunit *test)
+static int of_test_find_node_by_name_init(struct kunit *test)
 {
+       /* adding data for unittest */
+       KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, unittest_data_add());
+
+       if (!of_aliases)
+               of_aliases = of_find_node_by_path("/aliases");
+
+       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path(
+                       "/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a"));
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case of_test_find_node_by_name_cases[] = {
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_basic),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_trailing_slash),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_alias_and_slash),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_multiple_components_2),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_path),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_missing_alias_with_relative_path),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_and_slash),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_option_alias_and_slash),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_with_null_option_alias),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_find_node_by_name_option_clearing_root),
+       {},
+};
+
+static struct kunit_module of_test_find_node_by_name_module = {
+       .name = "of-test-find-node-by-name",
+       .init = of_test_find_node_by_name_init,
+       .test_cases = of_test_find_node_by_name_cases,
+};
+module_test(of_test_find_node_by_name_module);
+
+struct of_test_dynamic_context {
        struct device_node *np;
-       struct property *prop;
+       struct property *prop0;
+       struct property *prop1;
+};
 
-       np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data");
-       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
+static void of_test_dynamic_basic(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
+       struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
+       struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0;
 
-       /* Array of 4 properties for the purpose of testing */
-       prop = kcalloc(4, sizeof(*prop), GFP_KERNEL);
-       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, prop);
+       /* Add a new property - should pass*/
+       prop0->name = "new-property";
+       prop0->value = "new-property-data";
+       prop0->length = strlen(prop0->value) + 1;
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop0), 0,
+                           "Adding a new property failed\n");
+
+       /* Test that we can remove a property */
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, of_remove_property(np, prop0), 0);
+}
+
+static void of_test_dynamic_add_existing_property(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
+       struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
+       struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0, *prop1 = ctx->prop1;
 
        /* Add a new property - should pass*/
-       prop->name = "new-property";
-       prop->value = "new-property-data";
-       prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
-       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop), 0,
+       prop0->name = "new-property";
+       prop0->value = "new-property-data";
+       prop0->length = strlen(prop0->value) + 1;
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop0), 0,
                            "Adding a new property failed\n");
 
        /* Try to add an existing property - should fail */
-       prop++;
-       prop->name = "new-property";
-       prop->value = "new-property-data-should-fail";
-       prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
-       KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop), 0,
+       prop1->name = "new-property";
+       prop1->value = "new-property-data-should-fail";
+       prop1->length = strlen(prop1->value) + 1;
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_NE_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop1), 0,
                            "Adding an existing property should have failed\n");
+}
+
+static void of_test_dynamic_modify_existing_property(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
+       struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
+       struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0, *prop1 = ctx->prop1;
+
+       /* Add a new property - should pass*/
+       prop0->name = "new-property";
+       prop0->value = "new-property-data";
+       prop0->length = strlen(prop0->value) + 1;
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop0), 0,
+                           "Adding a new property failed\n");
 
        /* Try to modify an existing property - should pass */
-       prop->value = "modify-property-data-should-pass";
-       prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
-       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_update_property(np, prop), 0,
+       prop1->name = "new-property";
+       prop1->value = "modify-property-data-should-pass";
+       prop1->length = strlen(prop1->value) + 1;
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_update_property(np, prop1), 0,
                            "Updating an existing property should have 
passed\n");
+}
+
+static void of_test_dynamic_modify_non_existent_property(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
+       struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
+       struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0;
 
        /* Try to modify non-existent property - should pass*/
-       prop++;
-       prop->name = "modify-property";
-       prop->value = "modify-missing-property-data-should-pass";
-       prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
-       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_update_property(np, prop), 0,
+       prop0->name = "modify-property";
+       prop0->value = "modify-missing-property-data-should-pass";
+       prop0->length = strlen(prop0->value) + 1;
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_update_property(np, prop0), 0,
                            "Updating a missing property should have passed\n");
+}
 
-       /* Remove property - should pass */
-       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_remove_property(np, prop), 0,
-                           "Removing a property should have passed\n");
+static void of_test_dynamic_large_property(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
+       struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
+       struct property *prop0 = ctx->prop0;
 
        /* Adding very large property - should pass */
-       prop++;
-       prop->name = "large-property-PAGE_SIZEx8";
-       prop->length = PAGE_SIZE * 8;
-       prop->value = kzalloc(prop->length, GFP_KERNEL);
-       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, prop->value);
-       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop), 0,
+       prop0->name = "large-property-PAGE_SIZEx8";
+       prop0->length = PAGE_SIZE * 8;
+       prop0->value = kunit_kzalloc(test, prop0->length, GFP_KERNEL);
+       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, prop0->value);
+
+       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, of_add_property(np, prop0), 0,
                            "Adding a large property should have passed\n");
 }
 
-static int of_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+static int of_test_dynamic_init(struct kunit *test)
 {
-       /* adding data for unittest */
+       struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx;
+
        KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0, unittest_data_add());
 
        if (!of_aliases)
@@ -197,18 +375,45 @@ static int of_test_init(struct kunit *test)
        KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, of_find_node_by_path(
                        "/testcase-data/phandle-tests/consumer-a"));
 
+       ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx);
+       test->priv = ctx;
+
+       ctx->np = of_find_node_by_path("/testcase-data");
+       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->np);
+
+       ctx->prop0 = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx->prop0), GFP_KERNEL);
+       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->prop0);
+
+       ctx->prop1 = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx->prop1), GFP_KERNEL);
+       KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->prop1);
+
        return 0;
 }
 
-static struct kunit_case of_test_cases[] = {
-       KUNIT_CASE(of_unittest_find_node_by_name),
-       KUNIT_CASE(of_unittest_dynamic),
+static void of_test_dynamic_exit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+       struct of_test_dynamic_context *ctx = test->priv;
+       struct device_node *np = ctx->np;
+
+       of_remove_property(np, ctx->prop0);
+       of_remove_property(np, ctx->prop1);
+       of_node_put(np);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case of_test_dynamic_cases[] = {
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_basic),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_add_existing_property),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_modify_existing_property),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_modify_non_existent_property),
+       KUNIT_CASE(of_test_dynamic_large_property),
        {},
 };
 
-static struct kunit_module of_test_module = {
-       .name = "of-base-test",
-       .init = of_test_init,
-       .test_cases = of_test_cases,
+static struct kunit_module of_test_dynamic_module = {
+       .name = "of-dynamic-test",
+       .init = of_test_dynamic_init,
+       .exit = of_test_dynamic_exit,
+       .test_cases = of_test_dynamic_cases,
 };
-module_test(of_test_module);
+module_test(of_test_dynamic_module);
-- 
2.20.0.rc0.387.gc7a69e6b6c-goog

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to