On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:08 AM Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 01:17:47AM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > Hi Gerd, > > > > What happened with this series (and the next one)? > > Landed upstream in 4.20. > > > Semi-relatedly, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to just dump the > > BIG_ENDIAN flag and just define the "host" format to be the right one > > for a consistent little-endian interpretation. > > Not fully sure what you mean here. > > The big endian flag is needed to specify RGB565 or XRGB1555 format in > big endian byte order. For 32 bit depth we don't need it because > XRGB8888 big endian == BGRX8888 little endian (see also > include/drm/drm_fourcc.h).
Yeah we'd need to add a few more fourcc codes for the missing big-endian versions. Aside from that I like Ilia's idea of removing the BIG_ENDIAN flag, it causes lots of aliasing among formats, doesn't change anything with others, and we probably have a huge mess already ... -Daniel > > cheers, > Gerd > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
