Reviewed-by: Deepak Rawat <[email protected]>

On Thu, 2019-01-31 at 11:07 +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> The function was unconditionally returning 0, and a caller would have
> to
> rely on the returned fence pointer being NULL to detect errors.
> However,
> the function vmw_execbuf_copy_fence_user() would expect a non-zero
> error
> code in that case and would BUG otherwise.
> 
> So make sure we return a proper non-zero error code if the fence
> pointer
> returned is NULL.
> 
> Fixes: ae2a104058e2: ("vmwgfx: Implement fence objects")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
> index f2d13a72c05d..88b8178d4687 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_execbuf.c
> @@ -3570,7 +3570,7 @@ int vmw_execbuf_fence_commands(struct drm_file
> *file_priv,
>               *p_fence = NULL;
>       }
>  
> -     return 0;
> +     return ret;
>  }
>  
>  /**

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to