On 2/19/19 12:04 PM, jgli...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Jérôme Glisse <jgli...@redhat.com>

When notifying change for a range use MMU_NOTIFIER_USE_CHANGE_PTE flag
for page table update that use set_pte_at_notify() and where the we are
going either from read and write to read only with same pfn or read only
to read and write with new pfn.

Note that set_pte_at_notify() itself should only be use in rare cases
ie we do not want to use it when we are updating a significant range of
virtual addresses and thus a significant number of pte. Instead for
those cases the event provided to mmu notifer invalidate_range_start()
callback should be use for optimization.

Changes since v1:
     - Use the new unsigned flags field in struct mmu_notifier_range
     - Use the new flags parameter to mmu_notifier_range_init()
     - Explicitly list all the patterns where we can use change_pte()

Signed-off-by: Jérôme Glisse <jgli...@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarca...@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
Cc: Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehl...@amd.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@mellanox.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <zwis...@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mho...@kernel.org>
Cc: Christian Koenig <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Cc: Ralph Campbell <rcampb...@nvidia.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubb...@nvidia.com>
Cc: k...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-r...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
---
  include/linux/mmu_notifier.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  mm/ksm.c                     | 11 ++++++-----
  mm/memory.c                  |  5 +++--
  3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
index b6c004bd9f6a..0230a4b06b46 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
@@ -40,6 +40,26 @@ enum mmu_notifier_event {
        MMU_NOTIFY_SOFT_DIRTY,
  };
+/*
+ * @MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_BLOCKABLE: can the mmu notifier range_start/range_end
+ * callback block or not ? If set then the callback can block.
+ *
+ * @MMU_NOTIFIER_USE_CHANGE_PTE: only set when the page table it updated with
+ * the set_pte_at_notify() the valid patterns for this are:
+ *      - pte read and write to read only same pfn
+ *      - pte read only to read and write (pfn can change or stay the same)
+ *      - pte read only to read only with different pfn
+ * It is illegal to set in any other circumstances.
+ *
+ * Note that set_pte_at_notify() should not be use outside of the above cases.
+ * When updating a range in batch (like write protecting a range) it is better
+ * to rely on invalidate_range_start() and struct mmu_notifier_range to infer
+ * the kind of update that is happening (as an example you can look at the
+ * mmu_notifier_range_update_to_read_only() function).
+ */
+#define MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_BLOCKABLE (1 << 0)
+#define MMU_NOTIFIER_USE_CHANGE_PTE (1 << 1)
+
  #ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
/*
@@ -55,8 +75,6 @@ struct mmu_notifier_mm {
        spinlock_t lock;
  };
-#define MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_BLOCKABLE (1 << 0)
-
  struct mmu_notifier_range {
        struct vm_area_struct *vma;
        struct mm_struct *mm;
@@ -268,6 +286,12 @@ mmu_notifier_range_blockable(const struct 
mmu_notifier_range *range)
        return (range->flags & MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_BLOCKABLE);
  }
+static inline bool
+mmu_notifier_range_use_change_pte(const struct mmu_notifier_range *range)
+{
+       return (range->flags & MMU_NOTIFIER_USE_CHANGE_PTE);
+}
+
  static inline void mmu_notifier_release(struct mm_struct *mm)
  {
        if (mm_has_notifiers(mm))
@@ -509,6 +533,12 @@ mmu_notifier_range_blockable(const struct 
mmu_notifier_range *range)
        return true;
  }
+static inline bool
+mmu_notifier_range_use_change_pte(const struct mmu_notifier_range *range)
+{
+       return false;
+}
+
  static inline int mm_has_notifiers(struct mm_struct *mm)
  {
        return 0;
diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index b782fadade8f..41e51882f999 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -1066,9 +1066,9 @@ static int write_protect_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, 
struct page *page,
BUG_ON(PageTransCompound(page)); - mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, vma, mm,
-                               pvmw.address,
-                               pvmw.address + PAGE_SIZE);
+       mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR,
+                               MMU_NOTIFIER_USE_CHANGE_PTE, vma, mm,
+                               pvmw.address, pvmw.address + PAGE_SIZE);
        mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
if (!page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw))
@@ -1155,8 +1155,9 @@ static int replace_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, 
struct page *page,
        if (!pmd)
                goto out;
- mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, vma, mm, addr,
-                               addr + PAGE_SIZE);
+       mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR,
+                               MMU_NOTIFIER_USE_CHANGE_PTE,
+                               vma, mm, addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE);
        mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
ptep = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 45dbc174a88c..cb71d3ff1b97 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2282,8 +2282,9 @@ static vm_fault_t wp_page_copy(struct vm_fault *vmf)
__SetPageUptodate(new_page); - mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, vma, mm,
-                               vmf->address & PAGE_MASK,
+       mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR,
+                               MMU_NOTIFIER_USE_CHANGE_PTE,
+                               vma, mm, vmf->address & PAGE_MASK,
                                (vmf->address & PAGE_MASK) + PAGE_SIZE);
        mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);

Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampb...@nvidia.com>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to