Hi Maxime, On 2/11/19 17:02, Maxime Ripard wrote: > The current DT bindings assume that the DMA will be performed by the > devices through their parent DT node, and rely on that assumption for the > address translation using dma-ranges. > > However, some SoCs have devices that will perform DMA through another bus, > with separate address translation rules. We therefore need to express that > relationship, through the special interconnect name "dma". > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@bootlin.com> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt > index 5a3c575b387a..e69fc2d992c3 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt > @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ interconnect-names : List of interconnect path name strings > sorted in the same > interconnect-names to match interconnect paths with > interconnect > specifier pairs. > > + Reserved interconnect names: > + * dma: Path from the device to the main memory of > the system
Bikeshed: As it's from the device to the main memory, maybe here we can also denote this my calling the path dma-mem or dma-memory. For other paths, we are trying to mention both the source and the destination and maybe it would be good to be consistent although this is special one. Thanks, Georgi _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
