Hi Laurent,

On 06/03/2019 23:23, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Extend the drm_bridge_timings structure with a new dual_link field to
> indicate that the bridge's input bus carries data on two separate
> physical links. The first use case is LVDS dual-link mode where even-
> and odd-numbered pixels are transferred on separate LVDS links.

Do you foresee this becoming a bitfield in the future if there are more
options?

I don't think that affects this right now though, and it's fine as a bool.


> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+rene...@ideasonboard.com>

Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+rene...@ideasonboard.com>


> ---
>  include/drm/drm_bridge.h | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
> index d4428913a4e1..aea1fcfd92a7 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_bridge.h
> @@ -265,6 +265,14 @@ struct drm_bridge_timings {
>        * input signal after the clock edge.
>        */
>       u32 hold_time_ps;
> +     /**
> +      * @dual_link:
> +      *
> +      * True if the bus operates in dual-link mode. The exact meaning is
> +      * dependent on the bus type. For LVDS buses, this indicates that even-
> +      * and odd-numbered pixels are received on separate links.
> +      */
> +     bool dual_link;
>  };
>  
>  /**
> 

-- 
Regards
--
Kieran
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to