On Tuesday, May 21, 2019 11:48 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > With Eric's patch > > commit ba6e798ecf320716780bb6a6088a8d17dcba1d49 > Author: Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> > Date: Wed Apr 24 11:56:17 2019 -0700 > > drm/doc: Document expectation that userspace review looks at kernel uAPI. > > there's been concerns raised that we expect userspace people to do > in-depth kernel patch review. That's not reasonable, same way kernel > people can't review all the userspace we have. Try to clarify > expectations a bit more. > > Cc: Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> > Cc: Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> > Cc: cont...@emersion.fr > Cc: wayland-de...@lists.freedesktop.org > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com>
This LGTM, thanks for the patch! One tiny nit below, but regardless of whether it's changed or not: Reviewed-by: Simon Ser <cont...@emersion.fr> > --- > Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst b/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst > index 05874d09820c..f368e58fb727 100644 > --- a/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst > +++ b/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst > @@ -85,9 +85,9 @@ leads to a few additional requirements: > - The userspace side must be fully reviewed and tested to the standards of > that > userspace project. For e.g. mesa this means piglit testcases and review on > the > mailing list. This is again to ensure that the new interface actually gets > the > - job done. The userspace-side reviewer should also provide at least an > - Acked-by on the kernel uAPI patch indicating that they've looked at how the > - kernel side is implementing the new feature being used. > + job done. The userspace-side reviewer should also provide an Acked-by on > the > + kernel uAPI patch indicating that they believe the proposed uAPI is sound > and > + sufficiently documented and validated for userspace's consumption. Nit: "and" is repeated twice (maybe that's intentional?) > - The userspace patches must be against the canonical upstream, not some > vendor > fork. This is to make sure that no one cheats on the review and testing > -- > 2.20.1 > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
