On 6/6/19 11:44 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
From: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@mellanox.com>

This list is always read and written while holding hmm->lock so there is
no need for the confusing _rcu annotations.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <j...@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jgli...@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampb...@nvidia.com>

---
  mm/hmm.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index c2fecb3ecb11e1..709d138dd49027 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range,
        mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
range->hmm = hmm;
-       list_add_rcu(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
+       list_add(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
/*
         * If there are any concurrent notifiers we have to wait for them for
@@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
                return;
mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
-       list_del_rcu(&range->list);
+       list_del(&range->list);
        mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
/* Drop reference taken by hmm_range_register() */

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to