On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Ville Syrjälä <
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:34:06PM +0530, Shirish S wrote:
> > @@ -276,15 +283,21 @@ drm_do_probe_ddc_edid(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
> unsigned char *buf,
> > .buf = buf,
> > }
> > };
> > - ret = i2c_transfer(adapter, msgs, 2);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Avoid sending the segment addr to not upset non-compliant ddc
> > + * monitors.
> > + */
>
> Indentation is still wrong. Or is it gettimg mangled by some email server?
>
> I have double checked with checkpatch, i did not get any errors or
warnings,
looks like as you are saying may be true.
Requesting for merge!
> > + ret = i2c_transfer(adapter, &msgs[3 - xfers], xfers);
> > +
> > if (ret == -ENXIO) {
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("drm: skipping non-existent adapter
> %s\n",
> > adapter->name);
> > break;
> > }
> > - } while (ret != 2 && --retries);
> > + } while (ret != xfers && --retries);
> >
> > - return ret == 2 ? 0 : -1;
> > + return ret == xfers ? 0 : -1;
> > }
> >
> > static bool drm_edid_is_zero(u8 *in_edid, int length)
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
