On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 07:32, Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 17:09:16 -0400 Alex Deucher <alexdeuc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Go ahead and respin your patch as per the suggestion above.  then I
> > can apply it I can either merge hmm into amd's drm-next or we can just
> > provide the conflict fix patch whichever is easier.  Which hmm branch
> > is for 5.3?
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git/?h=hmm
>
> Please do not merge the hmm tree into yours - especially if the
> conflict comes down to just a few lines.  Linus has addressed this in
> the past.  There is a possibility that he may take some objection to
> the hmm tree (for example) and then your tree (and consequently the drm
> tree) would also not be mergeable.
>

I'm fine with merging the hmm tree if Jason has a stable non-rebasing
base. I'd rather merge into drm tree and then have amd backmerge if it
we are doing it.

But if we can just reduce the conflicts to a small amount it's easier
for everyone to just do that.

Dave.


> Just supply Linus with a hint about the conflict resolution.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to