On 02/08/2019 3:20 am, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
From: John Hubbard <jhubb...@nvidia.com>

For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages
via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or
release_pages().

This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d
("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeholder versions").

Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.mykleb...@hammerspace.com>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <anna.schuma...@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubb...@nvidia.com>
---
  fs/nfs/direct.c | 4 +---
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/direct.c b/fs/nfs/direct.c
index 0cb442406168..b00b89dda3c5 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
@@ -278,9 +278,7 @@ ssize_t nfs_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter 
*iter)
static void nfs_direct_release_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned int npages)
  {
-       unsigned int i;
-       for (i = 0; i < npages; i++)
-               put_page(pages[i]);
+       put_user_pages(pages, npages);
  }

Since it's static, and only called twice, might it be better to change its two callers [nfs_direct_{read,write}_schedule_iovec()] to call put_user_pages() directly, and remove nfs_direct_release_pages() entirely?

thanks,
calum.


void nfs_init_cinfo_from_dreq(struct nfs_commit_info *cinfo,

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to