Hi Artur. The patch1-4 in this series depend on other patches on mainline. On next v2 version, please make some patches based on patches in order to prevent the merge conflict.
 [RESEND PATCH v5 0/4] add coupled regulators for Exynos5422/5800 - https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/8/217 Also, as I commented, we better to discuss it before sending the v2. On 19. 7. 23. 오후 9:20, Artur Świgoń wrote: > The following patchset adds interconnect framework support to the > exynos-bus devfreq driver. Extending the devfreq driver with interconnect > capabilities started as a response to the issue referenced in . The > patches can be subdivided into four logical groups: > > (a) Refactoring the existing devfreq driver in order to improve readability > and accommodate for adding new code (patches 01--04/11). > > (b) Tweaking the interconnect framework to support the exynos-bus use case > (patches 05--07/11). Exporting of_icc_get_from_provider() allows us to > avoid hardcoding every single graph edge in the DT or driver source, and > relaxing the requirement contained in that function removes the need to > provide dummy node IDs in the DT. Adjusting the logic in > apply_constraints() (drivers/interconnect/core.c) accounts for the fact > that every bus is a separate entity and therefore a separate interconnect > provider, albeit constituting a part of a larger hierarchy. > > (c) Implementing interconnect providers in the exynos-bus devfreq driver > and adding required DT properties for one selected platform, namely > Exynos4412 (patches 08--09/11). Due to the fact that this aims to be a > generic driver for various Exynos SoCs, node IDs are generated dynamically > rather than hardcoded. This has been determined to be a simpler approach, > but depends on changes described in (b). > > (d) Implementing a sample interconnect consumer for exynos-mixer targeted > at the issue referenced in , again with DT info only for Exynos4412 > (patches 10--11/11). > > Integration of devfreq and interconnect functionalities comes down to one > extra line in the devfreq target() callback, which selects either the > frequency calculated by the devfreq governor, or the one requested with the > interconnect API, whichever is higher. All new code works equally well when > CONFIG_INTERCONNECT is 'n' (as in exynos_defconfig) in which case all > interconnect API functions are no-ops. > > --- > Artur Świgoń > Samsung R&D Institute Poland > Samsung Electronics > > --- > References: >  Documentation/interconnect/interconnect.rst >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/interconnect.txt >  https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10861757 > > Artur Świgoń (10): > devfreq: exynos-bus: Extract exynos_bus_profile_init() > devfreq: exynos-bus: Extract exynos_bus_profile_init_passive() > devfreq: exynos-bus: Change goto-based logic to if-else logic > devfreq: exynos-bus: Clean up code > icc: Export of_icc_get_from_provider() > icc: Relax requirement in of_icc_get_from_provider() > icc: Relax condition in apply_constraints() > arm: dts: exynos: Add parents and #interconnect-cells to Exynos4412 > devfreq: exynos-bus: Add interconnect functionality to exynos-bus > arm: dts: exynos: Add interconnects to Exynos4412 mixer > > Marek Szyprowski (1): > drm: exynos: mixer: Add interconnect support > > .../boot/dts/exynos4412-odroid-common.dtsi | 1 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi | 10 + > drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 296 ++++++++++++++---- > drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c | 68 +++- > drivers/interconnect/core.c | 12 +- > include/linux/interconnect-provider.h | 6 + > 6 files changed, 314 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-) > -- Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi Samsung Electronics _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel