Hi Fabrizio,

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 12:04:26PM +0100, Fabrizio Castro wrote:
> This panel is handled through the generic lvds-panel bindings,
> so only needs its additional compatible specified.
> 
> Some panel-specific documentation can be found here:
> https://buy.advantech.eu/Displays/Embedded-LCD-Kits-High-Brightness/model-IDK-2121WR-K2FHA2E.htm
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.cas...@bp.renesas.com>
> 
> ---
> v1->v2:
> * Reworked according to Laurent's feedback
> * Renamed lvds0_panel_in to panel_in0
> * Renamed lvds1_panel_in to panel_in1
> 
> Laurent,
> 
> Should this be a .yaml file already?

It's not a strict requirement, but I'm sure Rob would really appreciate.
I've converted a DT binding to yaml recently (for a panel too), and I
have to say I'm impressed by the validation yaml brings, both for DT
sources and for DT bindings. It even validates the example in the
bindings, which is great. Documentation/devicetree/writing-schema.md
should give you a few pointers to get started (in particular make sure
you run make dt_binding_check for your new bindings).

>  .../display/panel/advantech,idk-2121wr.txt         | 56 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/advantech,idk-2121wr.txt
> 
> diff --git 
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/advantech,idk-2121wr.txt 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/advantech,idk-2121wr.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6ee1d1b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/advantech,idk-2121wr.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> +Advantech Co., Ltd. IDK-2121WR 21.5" LVDS panel
> +===============================================
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: should be "advantech,idk-2121wr" followed by "panel-lvds"
> +
> +This binding is compatible with the lvds-panel binding, which is specified
> +in panel-lvds.txt in this directory.
> +The panel operates in dual-link mode and thus requires two port nodes,
> +the first port node expects odd pixels (1, 3, 5, etc.) and the second port
> +expects even pixels (0, 2, 4, etc.).
> +
> +Example
> +-------
> +
> +     panel {
> +             compatible = "advantech,idk-2121wr", "panel-lvds";
> +
> +             width-mm = <476>;
> +             height-mm = <268>;
> +
> +             data-mapping = "vesa-24";
> +
> +             panel-timing {
> +                     clock-frequency = <148500000>;
> +                     hactive = <1920>;
> +                     vactive = <1080>;
> +                     hsync-len = <44>;
> +                     hfront-porch = <88>;
> +                     hback-porch = <148>;
> +                     vfront-porch = <4>;
> +                     vback-porch = <36>;
> +                     vsync-len = <5>;
> +             };
> +
> +             ports {
> +                     #address-cells = <1>;
> +                     #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +                     port@0 {
> +                             /* Odd pixels */
> +                             reg = <0>;
> +                             panel_in0: endpoint {
> +                                     remote-endpoint = <&lvds0_out>;
> +                             };
> +                     };
> +
> +                     port@1 {
> +                             /* Even pixels */
> +                             reg = <1>;
> +                             panel_in1: endpoint {
> +                                     remote-endpoint = <&lvds1_out>;
> +                             };
> +                     };
> +             };
> +     };
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to