On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 05:34:39PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> No need to check the argument of i2c_unregister_device() because the
> function itself does it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com>

Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thomp...@linaro.org>


> ---
> Build tested only, buildbot is happy, too.
> 
> Please apply to your tree.
> 
>  drivers/video/backlight/tosa_lcd.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/tosa_lcd.c 
> b/drivers/video/backlight/tosa_lcd.c
> index 65cb7578776f..29af8e27b6e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/tosa_lcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/tosa_lcd.c
> @@ -222,8 +222,7 @@ static int tosa_lcd_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
>  {
>       struct tosa_lcd_data *data = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
>  
> -     if (data->i2c)
> -             i2c_unregister_device(data->i2c);
> +     i2c_unregister_device(data->i2c);
>  
>       tosa_lcd_tg_off(data);
>  
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to