Hi Jonathan, On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 4:25 PM Jonathan Marek <jonat...@marek.ca> wrote: > > Hi, > > I tried this and it works with patches 4+5 from Rob's series and > changing gpummu to use sg_phys(sg) instead of sg->dma_address > (dma_address isn't set now that dma_map_sg isn't used).
Thanks for testing it. I haven't had a chance to test it yet. Rob, I assume your series is targeted to 5.4, correct? If this is the case, what we should do about the i.MX5 regression on 5.3? Would a revert of the two commits be acceptable in 5.3 in order to avoid the regression? Please advise. Thanks _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
