> Am 30.09.2019 um 16:27 schrieb Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkei...@ti.com>: > > On 30/09/2019 17:20, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >> Let's see what Tero says, but yeah, something is odd here. I expected the >> max divider to be 16 with Tero's patch, but I don't see it having that >> effect. I can get the div to 31. >> You can see this from the clock register 0x48004e40 (CM_CLKSEL_DSS). The >> lowest bits are the divider, 5 to 0. The TRM says max div is 32. >> Tero said for him the dividers > 16 didn't "stick" to the register. I'm now >> wondering if he has an old beagleboard with OMAP34xx, which has max div 16. > > So testing a bit more here, I can see the DSS working fine and fps as > expected when I write values directly to CM_CLKSEL_DSS:5:0, with dividers up > to 31. With 32, DSS breaks. The TRM (AM/DM37x) says value 32 is valid.
Just a blind guess: is there something in the errata to take care of?