On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:56:32 -0700 Robert Morell <rmor...@nvidia.com> wrote:
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL is intended to be used for "an internal implementation > issue, and not really an interface". The dma-buf infrastructure is > explicitly intended as an interface between modules/drivers, so it > should use EXPORT_SYMBOL instead. NAK. This needs at the very least the approval of all rights holders for the files concerned and all code exposed by this change. Also I'd note if you are trying to do this for the purpose of combining it with proprietary code then you are still in my view as a (and the view of many other) rights holder to the kernel likely to be in breach of the GPL requirements for a derivative work. You may consider that formal notification of my viewpoint. Your corporate legal team can explain to you why the fact you are now aware of my view is important to them. Alan _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
