On Tuesday, 26 November 2019 19:37:40 GMT Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Hi Mihail.
Hi Sam, > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 01:16:26PM +0000, Mihail Atanassov wrote: > > No functional change. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mihail Atanassov <mihail.atanas...@arm.com> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_dvo.c | 4 +--- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_dvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_dvo.c > > index 68289b0b063a..20a3956b33bc 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_dvo.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_dvo.c > > @@ -462,9 +462,7 @@ static int sti_dvo_bind(struct device *dev, struct > > device *master, void *data) > > if (!bridge) > > return -ENOMEM; > > > > - bridge->driver_private = dvo; > > - bridge->funcs = &sti_dvo_bridge_funcs; > > - bridge->of_node = dvo->dev.of_node; > > + drm_bridge_init(bridge, &dvo->dev, &sti_dvo_bridge_funcs, NULL, dvo); > > drm_bridge_add(bridge); > > > > err = drm_bridge_attach(encoder, bridge, NULL); > > I can see from grepping that bridge.driver_private is used > in a couple of other files in sti/ > > Like sti_hdmi.c: > bridge->driver_private = hdmi; > bridge->funcs = &sti_hdmi_bridge_funcs; > drm_bridge_attach(encoder, bridge, NULL); > > > I wonder if a drm_bridge_init() should be added there. > I did not look closely - but it looked suspisiously. My goal with drm_bridge_init() was to get devlinks sorted out for cross-module uses of a drm_bridge (via of_drm_find_bridge()), so I only considered locations where drm_bridge_add/remove() were used. Would you be okay with a promise to push a cleanup of this one and the one in sti_hda.c after patch 1/30 lands in some form? I'd rather not make this series much longer, it's already pushing it at 30 :). > > Sam > -- Mihail _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
