On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 12:39:55PM +0530, Ramalingam C wrote:
> As we are not using the sysfs infrastructure anymore, link to it is
> removed. And global srm data and mutex to protect it are removed,
> with required handling at revocation check function.
> 

Hi Ram,
Thanks for taking this on. A few comments below..

> Yet to test hence RFC tag is added.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalinga...@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Sean Paul <seanp...@chromium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c     | 68 ++++++++++++++--------------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h |  4 --
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c    |  2 -
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c
> index 9191633a3c43..cc08d953eb53 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c
> @@ -23,13 +23,10 @@
>  
>  #include "drm_internal.h"
>  
> -static struct hdcp_srm {
> +struct hdcp_srm {

struct drm_hdcp_srm

would be more consistent with the rest of the subsystem

>       u32 revoked_ksv_cnt;
>       u8 *revoked_ksv_list;
> -
> -     /* Mutex to protect above struct member */
> -     struct mutex mutex;
> -} *srm_data;
> +};
>  
>  static inline void drm_hdcp_print_ksv(const u8 *ksv)
>  {
> @@ -91,7 +88,8 @@ static inline u32 get_vrl_length(const u8 *buf)
>       return drm_hdcp_be24_to_cpu(buf);
>  }
>  
> -static int drm_hdcp_parse_hdcp1_srm(const u8 *buf, size_t count)
> +static int drm_hdcp_parse_hdcp1_srm(const u8 *buf, size_t count,
> +                                 struct hdcp_srm *srm_data)

Usually the drm structs are the first argument.

>  {
>       struct hdcp_srm_header *header;
>       u32 vrl_length, ksv_count;
> @@ -153,7 +151,8 @@ static int drm_hdcp_parse_hdcp1_srm(const u8 *buf, size_t 
> count)
>       return count;
>  }
>  
> -static int drm_hdcp_parse_hdcp2_srm(const u8 *buf, size_t count)
> +static int drm_hdcp_parse_hdcp2_srm(const u8 *buf, size_t count,
> +                                 struct hdcp_srm *srm_data)
>  {
>       struct hdcp_srm_header *header;
>       u32 vrl_length, ksv_count, ksv_sz;
> @@ -226,18 +225,20 @@ static inline bool is_srm_version_hdcp2(const u8 *buf)
>       return *buf == (u8)(DRM_HDCP_2_SRM_ID << 4 | DRM_HDCP_2_INDICATOR);
>  }
>  
> -static void drm_hdcp_srm_update(const u8 *buf, size_t count)
> +static void drm_hdcp_srm_update(const u8 *buf, size_t count,
> +                             struct hdcp_srm *srm_data)
>  {
>       if (count < sizeof(struct hdcp_srm_header))
>               return;
>  
>       if (is_srm_version_hdcp1(buf))
> -             drm_hdcp_parse_hdcp1_srm(buf, count);
> +             drm_hdcp_parse_hdcp1_srm(buf, count, srm_data);
>       else if (is_srm_version_hdcp2(buf))
> -             drm_hdcp_parse_hdcp2_srm(buf, count);
> +             drm_hdcp_parse_hdcp2_srm(buf, count, srm_data);
>  }
>  
> -static void drm_hdcp_request_srm(struct drm_device *drm_dev)
> +static void drm_hdcp_request_srm(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
> +                              struct hdcp_srm *srm_data)
>  {
>       char fw_name[36] = "display_hdcp_srm.bin";
>       const struct firmware *fw;
> @@ -250,7 +251,7 @@ static void drm_hdcp_request_srm(struct drm_device 
> *drm_dev)
>               goto exit;
>  
>       if (fw->size && fw->data)
> -             drm_hdcp_srm_update(fw->data, fw->size);
> +             drm_hdcp_srm_update(fw->data, fw->size, srm_data);
>  
>  exit:
>       release_firmware(fw);
> @@ -284,35 +285,33 @@ static void drm_hdcp_request_srm(struct drm_device 
> *drm_dev)
>  bool drm_hdcp_check_ksvs_revoked(struct drm_device *drm_dev, u8 *ksvs,

Unrelated nit: This function should really return int and let the caller decide 
what to do
with the result.

>                                u32 ksv_count)
>  {
> -     u32 rev_ksv_cnt, cnt, i, j;
> +     struct hdcp_srm *srm_data;
>       u8 *rev_ksv_list;
> +     bool ret = false;
> +     u32 cnt, i, j;
>  
> +     srm_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*srm_data), GFP_KERNEL);

No need to put srm_data on the heap, it's only a pointer and a u32.

>       if (!srm_data)
> -             return false;
> +             return ret;
>  
> -     mutex_lock(&srm_data->mutex);
> -     drm_hdcp_request_srm(drm_dev);
> -
> -     rev_ksv_cnt = srm_data->revoked_ksv_cnt;
> +     drm_hdcp_request_srm(drm_dev, srm_data);
>       rev_ksv_list = srm_data->revoked_ksv_list;
>  
>       /* If the Revoked ksv list is empty */
> -     if (!rev_ksv_cnt || !rev_ksv_list) {
> -             mutex_unlock(&srm_data->mutex);
> -             return false;
> -     }
> +     if (!srm_data->revoked_ksv_cnt || !rev_ksv_list)

You can't have one of these true without the other, right?

I think you should just reverse the loops below and remove this condition
entirely.

> +             goto out;
>  
>       for  (cnt = 0; cnt < ksv_count; cnt++) {
>               rev_ksv_list = srm_data->revoked_ksv_list;
> -             for (i = 0; i < rev_ksv_cnt; i++) {
> +             for (i = 0; i < srm_data->revoked_ksv_cnt; i++) {
>                       for (j = 0; j < DRM_HDCP_KSV_LEN; j++)

Multi-line loops should have braces.

>                               if (ksvs[j] != rev_ksv_list[j]) {
>                                       break;
>                               } else if (j == (DRM_HDCP_KSV_LEN - 1)) {

This can be checked outside the 'j' loop (see below). but even better would be
to replace this whole loop with a memcmp.

>                                       DRM_DEBUG("Revoked KSV is ");
>                                       drm_hdcp_print_ksv(ksvs);
> -                                     mutex_unlock(&srm_data->mutex);
> -                                     return true;
> +                                     ret = true;
> +                                     goto out;
>                               }
>                       /* Move the offset to next KSV in the revoked list */
>                       rev_ksv_list += DRM_HDCP_KSV_LEN;
> @@ -321,28 +320,15 @@ bool drm_hdcp_check_ksvs_revoked(struct drm_device 
> *drm_dev, u8 *ksvs,
>               /* Iterate to next ksv_offset */
>               ksvs += DRM_HDCP_KSV_LEN;
>       }
> -     mutex_unlock(&srm_data->mutex);
> -     return false;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_hdcp_check_ksvs_revoked);
>  
> -int drm_setup_hdcp_srm(struct class *drm_class)
> -{
> -     srm_data = kzalloc(sizeof(*srm_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> -     if (!srm_data)
> -             return -ENOMEM;
> -     mutex_init(&srm_data->mutex);
> -
> -     return 0;
> -}
> -
> -void drm_teardown_hdcp_srm(struct class *drm_class)
> -{
> +out:
>       if (srm_data) {
>               kfree(srm_data->revoked_ksv_list);

IMO, we shouldn't be reaching into the struct to clear it. The struct is so
simple you could just pass the array and count around and get rid of it. The
alternative is adding a drm_hdcp_srm_destroy helper function to do this.

>               kfree(srm_data);
>       }
> +     return ret;
>  }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(drm_hdcp_check_ksvs_revoked);
>  
>  static struct drm_prop_enum_list drm_cp_enum_list[] = {
>       { DRM_MODE_CONTENT_PROTECTION_UNDESIRED, "Undesired" },
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h
> index 6937bf923f05..a34c7f8373fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h
> @@ -235,7 +235,3 @@ int drm_syncobj_query_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void 
> *data,
>  void drm_framebuffer_print_info(struct drm_printer *p, unsigned int indent,
>                               const struct drm_framebuffer *fb);
>  int drm_framebuffer_debugfs_init(struct drm_minor *minor);
> -
> -/* drm_hdcp.c */
> -int drm_setup_hdcp_srm(struct class *drm_class);
> -void drm_teardown_hdcp_srm(struct class *drm_class);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c
> index dd2bc85f43cc..2e83c3d72af9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_sysfs.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ int drm_sysfs_init(void)
>       }
>  
>       drm_class->devnode = drm_devnode;
> -     drm_setup_hdcp_srm(drm_class);
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -98,7 +97,6 @@ void drm_sysfs_destroy(void)
>  {
>       if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(drm_class))
>               return;
> -     drm_teardown_hdcp_srm(drm_class);
>       class_remove_file(drm_class, &class_attr_version.attr);
>       class_destroy(drm_class);
>       drm_class = NULL;
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to