On Friday, April 3, 2020 4:23 PM, Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 15:24 +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > On Fri, 03 Apr 2020 10:15:21 +0000 Simon Ser cont...@emersion.fr wrote: > > > > > Additionally, I've heard Pekka saying that it would be nice to have > > > constants > > > for property names in the UAPI headers. Indeed, this would prevent > > > hard-to-debug typo issues. I have a very good example of such a typo > > > issue that > > > took literally hours to debug, with X11 atoms which also use free-form > > > strings > > > like KMS properties [3]. > > > If we have constants for property names in UAPI headers, it wouldn't be a > > > big > > > hurdle to also have constants for enum values alongside. > > > > To clarify, the property names would be of the form > > #define DRM_KMS_PROPERTY_KERBLAH "KerBlah" > > while enum values would be integers, i.e. the raw values. > > Daniel Stone did have a good counter-argument to defining property > > names: userspace would be full of > > #ifndef DRM_KMS_PROPERTY_KERBLAH > > #define DRM_KMS_PROPERTY_KERBLAH "KerBleh" > > #endif > > anyway as long as they cannot rely on the headers to be recent enough. > > (The typo is intentional.) > > Why not put this in some external registry and regularly sync it into > drm-next? This seems like an xorgproto kind of problem to me. How would that fix the issue of KMS clients which don't want to depend on too recent dependencies? _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
