On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 06:53:41PM -0400, Jonathan Marek wrote:
> These never get set back to 0 when probing fails, so an attempt to probe
> again results in broken behavior. Fix the problem by setting thse to zero
> before they are used.

Reviewed-by: Jordan Crouse <[email protected]>

> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c
> index a22d30622306..aa9775ab52f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c
> @@ -93,7 +93,11 @@ static void msm_devfreq_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
>       /*
>        * Don't set the freq_table or max_state and let devfreq build the table
>        * from OPP
> +      * After a deferred probe, these may have be left to non-zero values,
> +      * so set them back to zero before creating the devfreq device
>        */
> +     msm_devfreq_profile.freq_table = NULL;
> +     msm_devfreq_profile.max_state = 0;
>  
>       gpu->devfreq.devfreq = devm_devfreq_add_device(&gpu->pdev->dev,
>                       &msm_devfreq_profile, DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND,
> -- 
> 2.26.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freedreno mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/freedreno

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to