在 2020/7/17 15:06, Daniel Vetter 写道:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:40 AM james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
<james.qian.w...@arm.com> wrote:

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 05:03:33PM +0800, Qinglang Miao wrote:
From: Liu Shixin <liushix...@huawei.com>

Use DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE macro to simplify the code.

Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushix...@huawei.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_dev.c | 13 +------------
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_dev.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_dev.c
index 0246b2e94..4a10e6b9e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_dev.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_dev.c
@@ -41,18 +41,7 @@ static int komeda_register_show(struct seq_file *sf, void *x)
       return 0;
  }

-static int komeda_register_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
-{
-     return single_open(filp, komeda_register_show, inode->i_private);
-}
-
-static const struct file_operations komeda_register_fops = {
-     .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
-     .open           = komeda_register_open,
-     .read_iter              = seq_read_iter,
-     .llseek         = seq_lseek,
-     .release        = single_release,
-};
+DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(komeda_register);


Hi Shixin & Qinglang

Thanks for your patch.

Reviewed-by: James Qian Wang <james.qian.w...@arm.com>

Since your patch is not for drm-misc-next, so seems better
to leave it to you to merge it. :)

I do think it's for drm-misc-next, what other tree would it be for?
Some people put -next in their patch tag to differentiate from -fixes,
so maintainers know what to do with the patch. It's also not part of a
series, hence I think this is on you to apply it.
>
Hi James & Daniel,

​Sorry I didn't make it clear in commit log, but it do based on linux-next.

​I think the reason why James think it's not for drm-misc-next
is conflicts exists when this patch being applied. There's conflicts because commit <4d4901c6d7> which switched over direct seq_read method calls to seq_read_iter should applied before this clean-up patch(linkage listed as below).

https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next/+/4d4901c6d748efab8aab6e7d2405dadaed0bea50

I can send a new patch based on mainline if needed.

​Thanks.

Qinglang

.
        
>
Cheers, Daniel


Thanks
James

  #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
  static void komeda_debugfs_init(struct komeda_dev *mdev)
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to