Am 19.07.20 um 14:57 schrieb Chauhan, Madhav:
[AMD Public Use]

-----Original Message-----
From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumer...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 6:21 PM
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chauhan, Madhav <madhav.chau...@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] drm/radeon: stop using TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE

The driver doesn't expose any not-mapable memory resources.

Looks like spell mistake in "mapable". Please check.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 13 ++++---------
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
index 54af06df865b..b474781a0920 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static int radeon_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, 
uint32_t type,
        switch (type) {
        case TTM_PL_SYSTEM:
                /* System memory */
-               man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE;
+               man->flags = 0;

adev memory was set to zero while allocated and adev->mman.bdev used to fetch 
different mman.
Do we need explicit initialization to '0'??

No, not really. But I wasn't sure if other drivers initialize their structures as well.

So I just kept it to be uniform across drivers to completely rework mem_type init at some point.

Regards,
Christian.


Regards,
Madhav

                man->available_caching = TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING;
                man->default_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED;
                break;
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static int radeon_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, 
uint32_t type,
                man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
                man->available_caching = TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING;
                man->default_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_CACHED;
-               man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE;
+               man->flags = 0;
  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AGP)
                if (rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_AGP) {
                        if (!rdev->ddev->agp) {
@@ -92,8 +92,6 @@ static int radeon_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, 
uint32_t type,
                                          (unsigned)type);
                                return -EINVAL;
                        }
-                       if (!rdev->ddev->agp->cant_use_aperture)
-                               man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE;
                        man->available_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED |
                                                 TTM_PL_FLAG_WC;
                        man->default_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_WC; @@ -103,8 +101,7 
@@ static int radeon_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
        case TTM_PL_VRAM:
                /* "On-card" video ram */
                man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
-               man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_FIXED |
-                            TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE;
+               man->flags = TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_FIXED;
                man->available_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED | TTM_PL_FLAG_WC;
                man->default_caching = TTM_PL_FLAG_WC;
                break;
@@ -394,7 +391,6 @@ static int radeon_bo_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, 
bool evict,
static int radeon_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *mem) {
-       struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man = &bdev->man[mem->mem_type];
        struct radeon_device *rdev = radeon_get_rdev(bdev);
mem->bus.addr = NULL;
@@ -402,8 +398,7 @@ static int radeon_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device 
*bdev, struct ttm_mem_
        mem->bus.size = mem->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
        mem->bus.base = 0;
        mem->bus.is_iomem = false;
-       if (!(man->flags & TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE))
-               return -EINVAL;
+
        switch (mem->mem_type) {
        case TTM_PL_SYSTEM:
                /* system memory */
--
2.17.1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to