On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 03:47:01PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 15:06 -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 01:29:35PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > Since we're about to start adding support for Intel's magic HDR
> > > backlight interface over DPCD, we need to ensure we're properly
> > > programming this field so that Intel specific sink services are exposed.
> > > Otherwise, 0x300-0x3ff will just read zeroes.
> > > 
> > > We also take care not to reprogram the source OUI if it already matches
> > > what we expect. This is just to be careful so that we don't accidentally
> > > take the panel out of any backlight control modes we found it in.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <ly...@redhat.com>
> > > Cc: thay...@noraisin.net
> > > Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anars...@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > index 4bd10456ad188..b591672ec4eab 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > @@ -3428,6 +3428,7 @@ void intel_dp_sink_set_decompression_state(struct
> > > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > >  void intel_dp_sink_dpms(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int mode)
> > >  {
> > >   struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > > + u8 edp_oui[] = { 0x00, 0xaa, 0x01 };
> > 
> > what are these values?

We in i915 typically use the OUI number for adding any eDP specific
quirks. I have seen these getting spit out in the dmesg log at thebeginning.
AFAIK It is some kind of OEM identification number for a display panel.

Manasi
> 
> I wish I knew, my assumption is this is the OUI that Intel's GPU driver uses 
> on
> other platforms, but I don't have any documentation mentioning this (in fact,
> the few documents I do have on this backlight interface don't seem to make any
> mention of it). I only managed to find this when looking through the last
> attempt someone did at adding support for this backlight interface:
> 
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/334989/
> 
> I think it should be fairly safe to write, as I know nouveau always programs a
> source OUI (we don't do it from our driver, but nvidia hardware seems to do it
> automatically) and I don't believe I've seen it ever change any behavior 
> besides
> making things appear in the 0x300-0x3ff register range.
> 
> AFAICT though, the backlight interface won't advertise itself without this 
> being
> set early on. If you could find anyone from Intel who knows more about it 
> though
> I'd definitely appreciate it (and just in general for the rest of the patch
> series as well)
> 
> > 
> > >   int ret, i;
> > >  
> > >   /* Should have a valid DPCD by this point */
> > > @@ -3443,6 +3444,14 @@ void intel_dp_sink_dpms(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > int mode)
> > >   } else {
> > >           struct intel_lspcon *lspcon = dp_to_lspcon(intel_dp);
> > >  
> > > +         /* Write the source OUI as early as possible */
> > > +         if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) {
> > > +                 ret = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SOURCE_OUI,
> > > edp_oui,
> > > +                                         sizeof(edp_oui));
> > > +                 if (ret < 0)
> > > +                         drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to write eDP source
> > > OUI\n");
> > > +         }
> > > +
> > >           /*
> > >            * When turning on, we need to retry for 1ms to give the sink
> > >            * time to wake up.
> > > @@ -4530,6 +4539,23 @@ static void intel_dp_get_dsc_sink_cap(struct 
> > > intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > >   }
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static void
> > > +intel_edp_init_source_oui(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > +{
> > > + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> > > + u8 oui[] = { 0x00, 0xaa, 0x01 };
> > > + u8 buf[3] = { 0 };
> > > +
> > > + if (drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SOURCE_OUI, buf, sizeof(buf)) <
> > > 0)
> > > +         drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to read source OUI\n");
> > > +
> > > + if (memcmp(oui, buf, sizeof(oui)) == 0)
> > > +         return;
> > > +
> > > + if (drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux, DP_SOURCE_OUI, oui, sizeof(oui)) <
> > > 0)
> > > +         drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to write source OUI\n");
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static bool
> > >  intel_edp_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -4607,6 +4633,12 @@ intel_edp_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > >   if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 10 || IS_GEMINILAKE(dev_priv))
> > >           intel_dp_get_dsc_sink_cap(intel_dp);
> > >  
> > > + /*
> > > +  * Program our source OUI so we can make various Intel-specific AUX
> > > +  * services available (such as HDR backlight controls)
> > > +  */
> > > + intel_edp_init_source_oui(intel_dp);
> > 
> > I believe we should restrict this to the supported platforms: cfl, whl, cml,
> > icl, tgl
> > no?
> > 
> > > +
> > >   return true;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -- 
> > > 2.26.2
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dri-devel mailing list
> > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> -- 
> Sincerely,
>       Lyude Paul (she/her)
>       Software Engineer at Red Hat
> 
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to