On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 08:27:04PM -0400, Jonathan Marek wrote:
> Add a new cache mode for creating coherent host-cached BOs.

Reviewed-by: Jordan Crouse <jcro...@codeaurora.org>

> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonat...@marek.ca>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c | 1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h              | 1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c              | 8 ++++++++
>  include/uapi/drm/msm_drm.h                 | 5 ++---
>  4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> index 9eeb46bf2a5d..2aa707546254 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_device.c
> @@ -410,6 +410,7 @@ static int adreno_bind(struct device *dev, struct device 
> *master, void *data)
>               config.rev.minor, config.rev.patchid);
>  
>       priv->is_a2xx = config.rev.core == 2;
> +     priv->has_cached_coherent = config.rev.core >= 6;
>  
>       gpu = info->init(drm);
>       if (IS_ERR(gpu)) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
> index 2c3225bc1794..6384844b1696 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
> @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ struct msm_drm_private {
>       struct msm_file_private *lastctx;
>       /* gpu is only set on open(), but we need this info earlier */
>       bool is_a2xx;
> +     bool has_cached_coherent;
>  
>       struct drm_fb_helper *fbdev;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> index b2f49152b4d4..ad9a627493ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
> @@ -431,6 +431,9 @@ static int msm_gem_pin_iova(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
>       if (msm_obj->flags & MSM_BO_MAP_PRIV)
>               prot |= IOMMU_PRIV;
>  
> +     if (msm_obj->flags & MSM_BO_CACHED_COHERENT)
> +             prot |= IOMMU_CACHE;
> +
>       WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&msm_obj->lock));
>  
>       if (WARN_ON(msm_obj->madv != MSM_MADV_WILLNEED))
> @@ -998,6 +1001,7 @@ static int msm_gem_new_impl(struct drm_device *dev,
>               uint32_t size, uint32_t flags,
>               struct drm_gem_object **obj)
>  {
> +     struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private;
>       struct msm_gem_object *msm_obj;
>  
>       switch (flags & MSM_BO_CACHE_MASK) {
> @@ -1005,6 +1009,10 @@ static int msm_gem_new_impl(struct drm_device *dev,
>       case MSM_BO_CACHED:
>       case MSM_BO_WC:
>               break;
> +     case MSM_BO_CACHED_COHERENT:
> +             if (priv->has_cached_coherent)
> +                     break;
> +             /* fallthrough */

It confused me that this kind of implicitly fell into the else clause in
msm_gem_mmap_obj, but I'm on board. This is a good solution since it only allows
I/O coherence with caching.

>       default:
>               DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev->dev, "invalid cache flag: %x\n",
>                               (flags & MSM_BO_CACHE_MASK));
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/msm_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/msm_drm.h
> index a6c1f3eb2623..474497e8743a 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/msm_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/msm_drm.h
> @@ -94,12 +94,11 @@ struct drm_msm_param {
>  #define MSM_BO_CACHED        0x00010000
>  #define MSM_BO_WC            0x00020000
>  #define MSM_BO_UNCACHED      0x00040000
> +#define MSM_BO_CACHED_COHERENT 0x080000
>  
>  #define MSM_BO_FLAGS         (MSM_BO_SCANOUT | \
>                                MSM_BO_GPU_READONLY | \
> -                              MSM_BO_CACHED | \
> -                              MSM_BO_WC | \
> -                              MSM_BO_UNCACHED)
> +                              MSM_BO_CACHE_MASK)
>  
>  struct drm_msm_gem_new {
>       __u64 size;           /* in */
> -- 
> 2.26.1
> 

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to