Hi,

Friendly second ping: who can take this?

I can add this to my -next branch for 5.14 if you don't mind.

JFYI: We had thousands of these sorts of warnings and now we are down
to just 23 in linux-next. This is one of those last remaining warnings.

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 4/20/21 15:13, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
> 
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo
> 
> On 3/5/21 03:58, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
>> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
>> through to the next case.
>>
>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo...@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/gf119.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/gf119.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/gf119.c
>> index 2b031d4eaeb6..684aff7437ee 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/gf119.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/gf119.c
>> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ pwm_info(struct nvkm_therm *therm, int line)
>>              default:
>>                      break;
>>              }
>> +            break;
>>      default:
>>              break;
>>      }
>>

Reply via email to