Property blob objects need to be destroyed when cleaning up to avoid
memory leaks. Go through the list of all blobs in the
drm_mode_config_cleanup() function and destroy them.
The drm_mode_config_cleanup() function needs to be moved after the
drm_property_destroy_blob() declaration. Move drm_mode_config_init() as
well to keep the functions together.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+rene...@ideasonboard.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 208 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 107 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
index cf4ce3d..b597734 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c
@@ -1120,44 +1120,6 @@ int drm_mode_create_dirty_info_property(struct
drm_device *dev)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_create_dirty_info_property);
-/**
- * drm_mode_config_init - initialize DRM mode_configuration structure
- * @dev: DRM device
- *
- * Initialize @dev's mode_config structure, used for tracking the graphics
- * configuration of @dev.
- *
- * Since this initializes the modeset locks, no locking is possible. Which is
no
- * problem, since this should happen single threaded at init time. It is the
- * driver's problem to ensure this guarantee.
- *
- */
-void drm_mode_config_init(struct drm_device *dev)
-{
- mutex_init(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
- mutex_init(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
- mutex_init(&dev->mode_config.fb_lock);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->mode_config.fb_list);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->mode_config.crtc_list);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->mode_config.connector_list);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->mode_config.encoder_list);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->mode_config.property_list);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->mode_config.property_blob_list);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->mode_config.plane_list);
- idr_init(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr);
-
- drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
- drm_mode_create_standard_connector_properties(dev);
- drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
-
- /* Just to be sure */
- dev->mode_config.num_fb = 0;
- dev->mode_config.num_connector = 0;
- dev->mode_config.num_crtc = 0;
- dev->mode_config.num_encoder = 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_config_init);
-
int drm_mode_group_init(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_mode_group *group)
{
uint32_t total_objects = 0;
@@ -1203,69 +1165,6 @@ int drm_mode_group_init_legacy_group(struct drm_device
*dev,
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_group_init_legacy_group);
/**
- * drm_mode_config_cleanup - free up DRM mode_config info
- * @dev: DRM device
- *
- * Free up all the connectors and CRTCs associated with this DRM device, then
- * free up the framebuffers and associated buffer objects.
- *
- * Note that since this /should/ happen single-threaded at driver/device
- * teardown time, no locking is required. It's the driver's job to ensure that
- * this guarantee actually holds true.
- *
- * FIXME: cleanup any dangling user buffer objects too
- */
-void drm_mode_config_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev)
-{
- struct drm_connector *connector, *ot;
- struct drm_crtc *crtc, *ct;
- struct drm_encoder *encoder, *enct;
- struct drm_framebuffer *fb, *fbt;
- struct drm_property *property, *pt;
- struct drm_plane *plane, *plt;
-
- list_for_each_entry_safe(encoder, enct, &dev->mode_config.encoder_list,
- head) {
- encoder->funcs->destroy(encoder);
- }
-
- list_for_each_entry_safe(connector, ot,
- &dev->mode_config.connector_list, head) {
- connector->funcs->destroy(connector);
- }
-
- list_for_each_entry_safe(property, pt, &dev->mode_config.property_list,
- head) {
- drm_property_destroy(dev, property);
- }
-
- /*
- * Single-threaded teardown context, so it's not required to grab the
- * fb_lock to protect against concurrent fb_list access. Contrary, it
- * would actually deadlock with the drm_framebuffer_cleanup function.
- *
- * Also, if there are any framebuffers left, that's a driver leak now,
- * so politely WARN about this.
- */
- WARN_ON(!list_empty(&dev->mode_config.fb_list));
- list_for_each_entry_safe(fb, fbt, &dev->mode_config.fb_list, head) {
- drm_framebuffer_remove(fb);
- }
-
- list_for_each_entry_safe(plane, plt, &dev->mode_config.plane_list,
- head) {
- plane->funcs->destroy(plane);
- }
-
- list_for_each_entry_safe(crtc, ct, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, head) {
- crtc->funcs->destroy(crtc);
- }
-
- idr_destroy(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_config_cleanup);
-
-/**
* drm_crtc_convert_to_umode - convert a drm_display_mode into a modeinfo
* @out: drm_mode_modeinfo struct to return to the user
* @in: drm_display_mode to use
@@ -4074,3 +3973,110 @@ int drm_format_vert_chroma_subsampling(uint32_t format)
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_format_vert_chroma_subsampling);
+
+/**
+ * drm_mode_config_init - initialize DRM mode_configuration structure
+ * @dev: DRM device
+ *
+ * Initialize @dev's mode_config structure, used for tracking the graphics
+ * configuration of @dev.
+ *
+ * Since this initializes the modeset locks, no locking is possible. Which is
no
+ * problem, since this should happen single threaded at init time. It is the
+ * driver's problem to ensure this guarantee.
+ *
+ */
+void drm_mode_config_init(struct drm_device *dev)
+{
+ mutex_init(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
+ mutex_init(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
+ mutex_init(&dev->mode_config.fb_lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->mode_config.fb_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->mode_config.crtc_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->mode_config.connector_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->mode_config.encoder_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->mode_config.property_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->mode_config.property_blob_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->mode_config.plane_list);
+ idr_init(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr);
+
+ drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
+ drm_mode_create_standard_connector_properties(dev);
+ drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
+
+ /* Just to be sure */
+ dev->mode_config.num_fb = 0;
+ dev->mode_config.num_connector = 0;
+ dev->mode_config.num_crtc = 0;
+ dev->mode_config.num_encoder = 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_config_init);
+
+/**
+ * drm_mode_config_cleanup - free up DRM mode_config info
+ * @dev: DRM device
+ *
+ * Free up all the connectors and CRTCs associated with this DRM device, then
+ * free up the framebuffers and associated buffer objects.
+ *
+ * Note that since this /should/ happen single-threaded at driver/device
+ * teardown time, no locking is required. It's the driver's job to ensure that
+ * this guarantee actually holds true.
+ *
+ * FIXME: cleanup any dangling user buffer objects too
+ */
+void drm_mode_config_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev)
+{
+ struct drm_connector *connector, *ot;
+ struct drm_crtc *crtc, *ct;
+ struct drm_encoder *encoder, *enct;
+ struct drm_framebuffer *fb, *fbt;
+ struct drm_property *property, *pt;
+ struct drm_property_blob *blob, *bt;
+ struct drm_plane *plane, *plt;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(encoder, enct, &dev->mode_config.encoder_list,
+ head) {
+ encoder->funcs->destroy(encoder);
+ }
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(connector, ot,
+ &dev->mode_config.connector_list, head) {
+ connector->funcs->destroy(connector);
+ }
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(property, pt, &dev->mode_config.property_list,
+ head) {
+ drm_property_destroy(dev, property);
+ }
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(blob, bt, &dev->mode_config.property_blob_list,
+ head) {
+ drm_property_destroy_blob(dev, blob);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Single-threaded teardown context, so it's not required to grab the
+ * fb_lock to protect against concurrent fb_list access. Contrary, it
+ * would actually deadlock with the drm_framebuffer_cleanup function.
+ *
+ * Also, if there are any framebuffers left, that's a driver leak now,
+ * so politely WARN about this.
+ */
+ WARN_ON(!list_empty(&dev->mode_config.fb_list));
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(fb, fbt, &dev->mode_config.fb_list, head) {
+ drm_framebuffer_remove(fb);
+ }
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(plane, plt, &dev->mode_config.plane_list,
+ head) {
+ plane->funcs->destroy(plane);
+ }
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(crtc, ct, &dev->mode_config.crtc_list, head) {
+ crtc->funcs->destroy(crtc);
+ }
+
+ idr_destroy(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_config_cleanup);
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
