Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl>
---
Untested. Perhaps the first test that people with access to the relevant
hardware might do, is to test _before applying this patch_ with FB_OMAP2
set. Perhaps this negative dependency isn't needed at all. Or is it
obvious?

 drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Kconfig
index 09f65dc..45875a0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Kconfig
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 
 config DRM_OMAP
        tristate "OMAP DRM"
-       depends on DRM && !CONFIG_FB_OMAP2
+       depends on DRM && !FB_OMAP2
        depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM
        depends on OMAP2_DSS
        select DRM_KMS_HELPER
-- 
1.7.11.7

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

Reply via email to